<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(3)</volume><submitter>Gera E</submitter><pubmed_abstract>In this paper, the spin-crossover (SCO) behavior of 26 transition metal complexes has been investigated by Density Functional Theory (DFT) using nine density functionals such as TPSS, BLYP, TPSSh, B3LYP, B3LYP*, OPBE, O3LYP, B3P86, and X3LYP, providing a comprehensive analysis of their effect towards computing spin-state energy gaps and spin transition temperature (&lt;i>T&lt;/i> &lt;sub>1/2&lt;/sub>) of these SCO complexes. The SCO behavior of a complex highly depends on the free energy balance of high- and low-spin states, which is likewise influenced by physical properties including dispersion and vibrational entropy, which are all considered in the performed DFT calculations. Among all the tested functionals, the hybrid &lt;i>meta&lt;/i>-GGA TPSSh functional and the B3LYP* functional predict the correct ground state and a reasonable HS-LS energy gap for all the SCO complexes. Their contemporary functionals, such as pure &lt;i>meta&lt;/i>-GGA TPSS and GGA BLYP functionals, also predict the correct GS for all the complexes, but they overestimate the HS-LS gaps. Interestingly, the OPBE and the B3P86 functionals also predict the correct ground state for nearly 50% of the studied complexes. The TPSSh-predicted energy gap is in the proper range for SCO to occur in the majority of cases, including the SCO complexes with unusual geometry, and the &lt;i>T&lt;/i> &lt;sub>1/2&lt;/sub> predicted using this functional is also in good agreement with the experimental ones.</pubmed_abstract><journal>RSC advances</journal><pagination>2241-2254</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12781908</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A systematic comparison of density functional methods for determining spin-state energy gaps and spin transition temperature of spin crossover complexes.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12781908</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Vignesh KR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gera E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A systematic comparison of density functional methods for determining spin-state energy gaps and spin transition temperature of spin crossover complexes.</name><description>In this paper, the spin-crossover (SCO) behavior of 26 transition metal complexes has been investigated by Density Functional Theory (DFT) using nine density functionals such as TPSS, BLYP, TPSSh, B3LYP, B3LYP*, OPBE, O3LYP, B3P86, and X3LYP, providing a comprehensive analysis of their effect towards computing spin-state energy gaps and spin transition temperature (&lt;i>T&lt;/i> &lt;sub>1/2&lt;/sub>) of these SCO complexes. The SCO behavior of a complex highly depends on the free energy balance of high- and low-spin states, which is likewise influenced by physical properties including dispersion and vibrational entropy, which are all considered in the performed DFT calculations. Among all the tested functionals, the hybrid &lt;i>meta&lt;/i>-GGA TPSSh functional and the B3LYP* functional predict the correct ground state and a reasonable HS-LS energy gap for all the SCO complexes. Their contemporary functionals, such as pure &lt;i>meta&lt;/i>-GGA TPSS and GGA BLYP functionals, also predict the correct GS for all the complexes, but they overestimate the HS-LS gaps. Interestingly, the OPBE and the B3P86 functionals also predict the correct ground state for nearly 50% of the studied complexes. The TPSSh-predicted energy gap is in the proper range for SCO to occur in the majority of cases, including the SCO complexes with unusual geometry, and the &lt;i>T&lt;/i> &lt;sub>1/2&lt;/sub> predicted using this functional is also in good agreement with the experimental ones.</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Jan</publication><modification>2026-06-06T12:40:48.675Z</modification><creation>2026-05-30T03:11:32.211Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12781908</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41522242</pubmed><doi>10.1039/d5ra09636g</doi></cross_references></HashMap>