<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Vasconcelos DDS</submitter><funding>Funda??o de Amparo ? Pesquisa do Estado de S?o Paulo</funding><funding>Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior</funding><pagination>1019-1029</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12809529</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Batteries with LiFePO&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> as active material stand out due to the absence of critical materials, such as nickel and cobalt, thermal stability, and security. In the next years, high volumes of LFP batteries will reach their end of life, and overall material recovery will contribute to meeting the Li demand and reducing the CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> footprint. Recovery of 97% of plastics and 85.3% graphite prevented materials from burning in furnaces and reduced the CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> footprint from recycling. Leaching cathode active material using H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>SO&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> without H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>O&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> resulted in active material leaching with reduced metallic foil solubilization and less reagent consumption. Redirecting H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>O&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> consumption to Fe removal by precipitation, combined with ion exchange columns at 25 °C, successfully deepened Fe purification from solution. Precipitation of Al recovered 15.3% as an Al-(OH)&lt;sub>3&lt;/sub> coproduct. After evaporation in a real solution, 72.2% of Li was precipitated as Li&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>CO&lt;sub>3&lt;/sub>, contributing to increasing the recycling share in the Li supply.</pubmed_abstract><journal>ACS omega</journal><pubmed_title>Hydrometallurgical Strategy To Reduce Waste through the Recycling of Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12809529</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2021/14842-0</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2019/11866-5</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2020/00493-0</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2012/51871/9</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Botelho Junior AB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Romano Espinosa DC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vasconcelos DDS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gobo LA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tenorio JAS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Hydrometallurgical Strategy To Reduce Waste through the Recycling of Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries.</name><description>Batteries with LiFePO&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> as active material stand out due to the absence of critical materials, such as nickel and cobalt, thermal stability, and security. In the next years, high volumes of LFP batteries will reach their end of life, and overall material recovery will contribute to meeting the Li demand and reducing the CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> footprint. Recovery of 97% of plastics and 85.3% graphite prevented materials from burning in furnaces and reduced the CO&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> footprint from recycling. Leaching cathode active material using H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>SO&lt;sub>4&lt;/sub> without H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>O&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> resulted in active material leaching with reduced metallic foil solubilization and less reagent consumption. Redirecting H&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>O&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub> consumption to Fe removal by precipitation, combined with ion exchange columns at 25 °C, successfully deepened Fe purification from solution. Precipitation of Al recovered 15.3% as an Al-(OH)&lt;sub>3&lt;/sub> coproduct. After evaporation in a real solution, 72.2% of Li was precipitated as Li&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>CO&lt;sub>3&lt;/sub>, contributing to increasing the recycling share in the Li supply.</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Jan</publication><modification>2026-06-06T15:06:29.772Z</modification><creation>2026-06-01T03:10:53.959Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12809529</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41552450</pubmed><doi>10.1021/acsomega.5c07786</doi></cross_references></HashMap>