<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>7(2)</volume><submitter>Huang J</submitter><pubmed_abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and pyrotinib (TPPy) versus dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TP) in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer were randomized (1:1) to receive TPPy or TP alongside weekly nab-paclitaxel for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR; ypT0/isN0). Exploratory biomarker and pathway analysis was done to identify patients benefiting from pyrotinib. A total of 109 patients were enrolled, and 108 received treatment: 55 in the TPPy group and 53 in the TP group. The tpCR rate was 65.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51.4%-77.8%) in the TPPy group, and 60.4% (95% CI: 46.0%-73.5%) in the TP group (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.585). In the TPPy group, 52 (94.5%) and 23 (41.8%) patients experienced dose interruption and discontinuation, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events in the TPPy and TP groups were diarrhea (58.1% vs. 0%) and neutropenia (23.6% vs. 15.1%). In conclusion, triple HER2 blockade did not improve tpCR rates compared with dual blockade but was associated with greater toxicity, particularly diarrhea.</pubmed_abstract><journal>MedComm</journal><pagination>e70611</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12812331</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Triple HER2 Blockade With Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Pyrotinib Versus Dual HER2 Blockade in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Phase II Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12812331</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ren W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shen K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hong J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tong Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gao W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shi H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Triple HER2 Blockade With Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, and Pyrotinib Versus Dual HER2 Blockade in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Phase II Study.</name><description>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and pyrotinib (TPPy) versus dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TP) in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer were randomized (1:1) to receive TPPy or TP alongside weekly nab-paclitaxel for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR; ypT0/isN0). Exploratory biomarker and pathway analysis was done to identify patients benefiting from pyrotinib. A total of 109 patients were enrolled, and 108 received treatment: 55 in the TPPy group and 53 in the TP group. The tpCR rate was 65.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51.4%-77.8%) in the TPPy group, and 60.4% (95% CI: 46.0%-73.5%) in the TP group (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.585). In the TPPy group, 52 (94.5%) and 23 (41.8%) patients experienced dose interruption and discontinuation, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events in the TPPy and TP groups were diarrhea (58.1% vs. 0%) and neutropenia (23.6% vs. 15.1%). In conclusion, triple HER2 blockade did not improve tpCR rates compared with dual blockade but was associated with greater toxicity, particularly diarrhea.</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Feb</publication><modification>2026-06-30T03:31:28.852Z</modification><creation>2026-06-30T03:21:23.959Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12812331</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41556040</pubmed><doi>10.1002/mco2.70611</doi></cross_references></HashMap>