<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>31(2)</volume><submitter>Di Costanzo F</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Context&lt;/h4>With new treatment strategies approved in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), heterogeneity across trials hinders the physicians' choice for first-line treatment.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of currently approved treatments for mHSPC stratifying patients according to their disease burden (high- vs. low-volume as per CHAARTED criteria) and onset of metastatic disease (synchronous vs. metachronous).&lt;h4>Intervention&lt;/h4>Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until October 30, 2024 were included. Treatment regimens were grouped as triplets for combinations of docetaxel, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), separate doublets for d</pubmed_abstract><journal>The oncologist</journal><pagination>oyaf386</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12832964</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Best therapeutic approach in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer based on disease volume: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12832964</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Briganti A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Conteduca V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dima G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rebuzzi SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maiorano BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mercinelli C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fornarini G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Formisano L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rescigno P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Santoni M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Giorgi U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caffo O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Messina C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Signori A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Procopio G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Banna GL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montorsi F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Costanzo F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oing C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Necchi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galli L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Maio M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Best therapeutic approach in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer based on disease volume: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Context&lt;/h4>With new treatment strategies approved in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), heterogeneity across trials hinders the physicians' choice for first-line treatment.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of currently approved treatments for mHSPC stratifying patients according to their disease burden (high- vs. low-volume as per CHAARTED criteria) and onset of metastatic disease (synchronous vs. metachronous).&lt;h4>Intervention&lt;/h4>Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until October 30, 2024 were included. Treatment regimens were grouped as triplets for combinations of docetaxel, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), separate doublets for d</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Jan</publication><modification>2026-06-06T03:22:06.754Z</modification><creation>2026-06-06T03:10:44.804Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12832964</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41247101</pubmed><doi>10.1093/oncolo/oyaf386</doi></cross_references></HashMap>