<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6</volume><submitter>In GK</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Understanding of comparative efficacy of treatments can inform clinical decision-making. This study compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) across patients with metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma initiating encorafenib + binimetinib (ENCO + BINI), dabrafenib + trametinib (DAB + TRAM), and vemurafenib + cobimetinib (VEM + COBI).&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>In this hybrid study, we contextualized OS and PFS between patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma receiving ENCO + BINI in the phase III COLUMBUS trial (enrollment: December 2013 to April 2015) versus real-world data (RWD) from a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database (treatment initiation: 2014-2021). After observing consistent outcomes across trial and RWD, we compared OS and PFS for a pooled ENCO + BINI cohort across these settings versus comparable DAB + TRAM and VEM + COBI cohorts from the real-world database.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Of 716 patients [ENCO + BINI (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 275; &lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 192 from COLUMBUS, &lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 83 from RWD), DAB + TRAM (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 387), VEM + COBI (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 54)], mean age was 56-60 years. OS and PFS were similar for ENCO + BINI-treated patients in COLUMBUS and RWD [adjusted hazard ratios: 1.03 (95% CI 0.62-1.72) for OS, 1.10 (0.69-1.75) for PFS]. Relative to the pooled ENCO + BINI group, adjusted OS and PFS were significantly worse for DAB + TRAM [OS: 1.32 (1.05-1.65), PFS: 1.49 (1.20-1.87)] and comparable for VEM + COBI [OS: 1.17 (0.76-1.79), PFS: 1.20 (0.79-1.82)]. Results were similar in comparisons based on the RWD groups alone, when trial data were excluded.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>OS and PFS were longer with ENCO + BINI relative to DAB + TRAM and comparable to VEM + COBI, after adjusting for differences in patient profiles. These findings add to evidence informing the use of combination v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B protein (BRAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors in metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma.</pubmed_abstract><journal>ESMO real world data and digital oncology</journal><pagination>100071</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12836643</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparative effectiveness among BRAF plus MEK inhibitors for patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12836643</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Rezai N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>di Pietro A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simpson R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Signorovitch J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>In GK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Christensen D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kalia S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sajeev G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparative effectiveness among BRAF plus MEK inhibitors for patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Understanding of comparative efficacy of treatments can inform clinical decision-making. This study compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) across patients with metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma initiating encorafenib + binimetinib (ENCO + BINI), dabrafenib + trametinib (DAB + TRAM), and vemurafenib + cobimetinib (VEM + COBI).&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>In this hybrid study, we contextualized OS and PFS between patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma receiving ENCO + BINI in the phase III COLUMBUS trial (enrollment: December 2013 to April 2015) versus real-world data (RWD) from a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database (treatment initiation: 2014-2021). After observing consistent outcomes across trial and RWD, we compared OS and PFS for a pooled ENCO + BINI cohort across these settings versus comparable DAB + TRAM and VEM + COBI cohorts from the real-world database.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Of 716 patients [ENCO + BINI (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 275; &lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 192 from COLUMBUS, &lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 83 from RWD), DAB + TRAM (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 387), VEM + COBI (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 54)], mean age was 56-60 years. OS and PFS were similar for ENCO + BINI-treated patients in COLUMBUS and RWD [adjusted hazard ratios: 1.03 (95% CI 0.62-1.72) for OS, 1.10 (0.69-1.75) for PFS]. Relative to the pooled ENCO + BINI group, adjusted OS and PFS were significantly worse for DAB + TRAM [OS: 1.32 (1.05-1.65), PFS: 1.49 (1.20-1.87)] and comparable for VEM + COBI [OS: 1.17 (0.76-1.79), PFS: 1.20 (0.79-1.82)]. Results were similar in comparisons based on the RWD groups alone, when trial data were excluded.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>OS and PFS were longer with ENCO + BINI relative to DAB + TRAM and comparable to VEM + COBI, after adjusting for differences in patient profiles. These findings add to evidence informing the use of combination v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B protein (BRAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors in metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Dec</publication><modification>2026-07-05T03:13:35.373Z</modification><creation>2026-07-05T03:11:43.19Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12836643</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41646100</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100071</doi></cross_references></HashMap>