<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhaxi B</submitter><funding>Peking Union Medical College Hospital Youth Category-D Program</funding><funding>Beijing Natural Science Foundation - Daxing Innovation Joint Fund</funding><pagination>288</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12839619</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Background:&lt;/b> Patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) enables continuous analytical monitoring using routine patient results; however, the performance of classical statistical process control (SPC) algorithms varies across analytes, and standardized evaluation and optimization strategies remain limited. To address this gap, this study compared three SPC algorithms-moving average (MA), moving quantile (MQ), and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA)-within a unified preprocessing framework and proposed a composite performance metric for parameter optimization. &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> Routine patient results from six laboratory analytes were analyzed using a standardized "transform-truncate-alarm" PBRTQC workflow. Simulated systematic biases were introduced for model training, an</pubmed_abstract><journal>Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)</journal><pubmed_title>Comparison of EWMA, MA, and MQ Under a Unified PBRTQC Framework for Thyroid and Coagulation Tests.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12839619</pmcid><funding_grant_id>L256080</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UHB12728</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Zhaxi B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ding W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ma C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Qiu L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of EWMA, MA, and MQ Under a Unified PBRTQC Framework for Thyroid and Coagulation Tests.</name><description>&lt;b>Background:&lt;/b> Patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) enables continuous analytical monitoring using routine patient results; however, the performance of classical statistical process control (SPC) algorithms varies across analytes, and standardized evaluation and optimization strategies remain limited. To address this gap, this study compared three SPC algorithms-moving average (MA), moving quantile (MQ), and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA)-within a unified preprocessing framework and proposed a composite performance metric for parameter optimization. &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> Routine patient results from six laboratory analytes were analyzed using a standardized "transform-truncate-alarm" PBRTQC workflow. Simulated systematic biases were introduced for model training, an</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Jan</publication><modification>2026-06-17T03:22:32.167Z</modification><creation>2026-06-17T03:10:39.891Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12839619</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41594266</pubmed><doi>10.3390/diagnostics16020288</doi></cross_references></HashMap>