<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(2)</volume><submitter>Bakhshaliyev S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Background&lt;/b>: This study evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and 128-slice multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography in congenital heart disease (CHD). &lt;b>Methods&lt;/b>: Between January 2018 and August 2022, 50 patients diagnosed with CHD underwent both TTE and ECG-gated 128-MSCT. The imaging findings were compared with intraoperative observations, categorizing pathologies into cardiac, heart-great vessel, and great vessel malformations. &lt;b>Results&lt;/b>: The median age of the patients was 0.45 months, and the median weight was 5 kg. Echocardiography showed a sensitivity of 89.8% and specificity of 99.12%, with an overall accuracy of 98%. MSCT had a sensitivity of 87.9%, specificity of 98.95%, and accuracy of 97.62%. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two modalities (χ&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 31.796, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.215), with substantial agreement (kappa = 0.901). For surgically confirmed cardiac malformations (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 69), echocardiography had a 100% sensitivity, whereas MSCT had an 88.41% sensitivity (χ&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 20.633, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.039), with high concordance (kappa = 0.931). For heart-great vessel connection anomalies (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 27), both modalities had an 81.48% sensitivity (χ&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 14.115, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.481), with substantial agreement (kappa = 0.887). For great vessel malformations (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 61), the echocardiography and MSCT sensitivities were 81.97% and 88.52%, respectively, with no significant difference in performance (χ&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 30.303, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.063), indicating substantial concordance (kappa = 0.863). &lt;b>Conclusions&lt;/b>: Both TTE and MSCT are highly accurate for CHD diagnosis, each with unique advantages. Their complementary use, especially where one modality is limited, enables a more comprehensive assessment, supporting clinical decision-making and surgical planning.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)</journal><pagination>259</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12839741</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac CT and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Congenital Heart Disease: A Surgical Correlation Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12839741</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Zeybek C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huseynov H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ince D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arslanoglu E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yigit F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aliyev B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Polat B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bakhshaliyev S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac CT and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Congenital Heart Disease: A Surgical Correlation Study.</name><description>&lt;b>Background&lt;/b>: This study evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and 128-slice multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography in congenital heart disease (CHD). &lt;b>Methods&lt;/b>: Between January 2018 and August 2022, 50 patients diagnosed with CHD underwent both TTE and ECG-gated 128-MSCT. The imaging findings were compared with intraoperative observations, categorizing pathologies into cardiac, heart-great vessel, and great vessel malformations. &lt;b>Results&lt;/b>: The median age of the patients was 0.45 months, and the median weight was 5 kg. Echocardiography showed a sensitivity of 89.8% and specificity of 99.12%, with an overall accuracy of 98%. MSCT had a sensitivity of 87.9%, specificity of 98.95%, and accuracy of 97.62%. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two modalities (χ&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 31.796, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.215), with substantial agreement (kappa = 0.901). For surgically confirmed cardiac malformations (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 69), echocardiography had a 100% sensitivity, whereas MSCT had an 88.41% sensitivity (χ&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 20.633, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.039), with high concordance (kappa = 0.931). For heart-great vessel connection anomalies (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 27), both modalities had an 81.48% sensitivity (χ&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 14.115, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.481), with substantial agreement (kappa = 0.887). For great vessel malformations (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 61), the echocardiography and MSCT sensitivities were 81.97% and 88.52%, respectively, with no significant difference in performance (χ&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup> = 30.303, &lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.063), indicating substantial concordance (kappa = 0.863). &lt;b>Conclusions&lt;/b>: Both TTE and MSCT are highly accurate for CHD diagnosis, each with unique advantages. Their complementary use, especially where one modality is limited, enables a more comprehensive assessment, supporting clinical decision-making and surgical planning.</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Jan</publication><modification>2026-06-15T03:19:09.868Z</modification><creation>2026-06-15T03:08:53.341Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12839741</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41594235</pubmed><doi>10.3390/diagnostics16020259</doi></cross_references></HashMap>