<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15(2)</volume><submitter>Celik S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Background/Objectives&lt;/b>: Eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is widely used in the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of generic eltrombopag (Rompag&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup>) with original eltrombopag (Revolade&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup>) in adult patients with R/R ITP. &lt;b>Methods&lt;/b>: In this prospective, multicenter study conducted at 10 centers, 104 adult ITP patients were followed for at least 3 months. A total of 35 (33.7%) patients received Rompag&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> and 69 (66.3%) received Revolade&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup>. The primary endpoint was platelet (PLT) response, defined as achieving a PLT count ≥50 × 10&lt;sup>9&lt;/sup>/L and at least a twofold increase from baseline, without the need for rescue therapy o</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical medicine</journal><pagination>634</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12841940</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Original Versus Generic Eltrombopag in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Prospective Multi-Center Experience on Efficacy and Safety.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12841940</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Selim C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Celik S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kırcalı E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Senturk Yıkılmaz A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Demircan V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ciftciler R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kurt Yuksel M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karabulut ZT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yıldız A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pınar IE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eroglu Kucukdiler AH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Acar NG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yaman S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Keskin D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Acar IH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Original Versus Generic Eltrombopag in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Prospective Multi-Center Experience on Efficacy and Safety.</name><description>&lt;b>Background/Objectives&lt;/b>: Eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is widely used in the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of generic eltrombopag (Rompag&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup>) with original eltrombopag (Revolade&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup>) in adult patients with R/R ITP. &lt;b>Methods&lt;/b>: In this prospective, multicenter study conducted at 10 centers, 104 adult ITP patients were followed for at least 3 months. A total of 35 (33.7%) patients received Rompag&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> and 69 (66.3%) received Revolade&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup>. The primary endpoint was platelet (PLT) response, defined as achieving a PLT count ≥50 × 10&lt;sup>9&lt;/sup>/L and at least a twofold increase from baseline, without the need for rescue therapy o</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Jan</publication><modification>2026-06-15T03:18:51.898Z</modification><creation>2026-06-15T03:08:51.149Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12841940</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41598573</pubmed><doi>10.3390/jcm15020634</doi></cross_references></HashMap>