<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Nalesnik M</submitter><funding>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</funding><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIEHS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>kfaf150</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12844565</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>209(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Wildfires have surged in frequency and severity, and in 2022, they contributed to nearly 30% of the fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5) in the United States. Health effects from wildfire-induced wood smoke (WS) exposure include worsened pre-existing lung diseases and lung function, increased emergency room visits, and increased risk of premature death. Evidence suggests that males and females have unique responses to air pollutants, but sex-specific responses to WS remain understudied. To evaluate whether males and females differentially respond to WS, we analyzed induced sputum samples in humans following a controlled chamber exposure to WS. A total of 79 participants were exposed to 500 µg/m3 of WS for 2 h with intermittent exercise, and a subset of participants' samples were analy</pubmed_abstract><journal>Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology</journal><pubmed_title>Exploratory analysis of the impact of sex on sputum proteomic response to inhaled wood smoke in humans.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12844565</pmcid><funding_grant_id>K01 ES032837</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1 TR004406</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01ES032837</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA016086</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 ES007126</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 ES025124</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32ES007126</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01ES025124</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Hickman E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mills AC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jaspers I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rager JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Payton A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nalesnik M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mordant AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alexis NE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rebuli ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Almond M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Herring L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peden DB</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Exploratory analysis of the impact of sex on sputum proteomic response to inhaled wood smoke in humans.</name><description>Wildfires have surged in frequency and severity, and in 2022, they contributed to nearly 30% of the fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5) in the United States. Health effects from wildfire-induced wood smoke (WS) exposure include worsened pre-existing lung diseases and lung function, increased emergency room visits, and increased risk of premature death. Evidence suggests that males and females have unique responses to air pollutants, but sex-specific responses to WS remain understudied. To evaluate whether males and females differentially respond to WS, we analyzed induced sputum samples in humans following a controlled chamber exposure to WS. A total of 79 participants were exposed to 500 µg/m3 of WS for 2 h with intermittent exercise, and a subset of participants' samples were analy</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Jan</publication><modification>2026-07-14T21:28:46.042Z</modification><creation>2026-06-25T03:07:33.356Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12844565</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41134656</pubmed><doi>10.1093/toxsci/kfaf150</doi></cross_references></HashMap>