{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["26(1)"],"submitter":["Tindal K"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Stillbirth research priorities for Australia were identified in 2015. A renewed priority setting exercise identified current research priorities to address the national burden of stillbirth.<h4>Methods</h4>Bereaved parents, healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and community-based support organisations participated in this priority setting partnership. Using a modified James Lind Alliance approach, proposed research questions were collated, refined and reviewed against existing evidence, with participants ranking their top ten research questions. Twenty-six key stakeholders at an in-person forum then determined the top research priorities.<h4>Results</h4>Consultations were attended by 243 participants, representing over 30 community and professional organi"],"journal":["BMC pregnancy and childbirth"],"pagination":["94"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12849368"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Research priorities for stillbirth in Australia: outcomes of a national priority setting partnership."],"pmcid":["PMC12849368"],"pubmed_authors":["Ellwood D","Middleton P","McIntyre S","Andrews C","Boyle F","Astell C","Yelland J","Stuart-Butler D","Jenkinson B","Seeho S","Tindal K","Flenady V","Davies-Tuck M","Gordon A"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Research priorities for stillbirth in Australia: outcomes of a national priority setting partnership.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Stillbirth research priorities for Australia were identified in 2015. A renewed priority setting exercise identified current research priorities to address the national burden of stillbirth.<h4>Methods</h4>Bereaved parents, healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and community-based support organisations participated in this priority setting partnership. Using a modified James Lind Alliance approach, proposed research questions were collated, refined and reviewed against existing evidence, with participants ranking their top ten research questions. Twenty-six key stakeholders at an in-person forum then determined the top research priorities.<h4>Results</h4>Consultations were attended by 243 participants, representing over 30 community and professional organi","dates":{"release":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2025 Dec","modification":"2026-06-09T06:48:08.942Z","creation":"2026-06-09T03:12:01.578Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC12849368","cross_references":{"pubmed":["41449344"],"doi":["10.1186/s12884-025-08552-6"]}}