<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16</volume><submitter>Cheng YW</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The comparative kidney-protective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with varying past estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline rates remain unclear.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This retrospective study analyzed 4,011 propensity score-matched T2D people from a multi-center database, each with at least 2 years of eGFR data before therapy and 1 year of follow-up. The patients received either SGLT2i or DPP4i between June 2016 and December 2021.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among paired patients, 23.7% (SGLT2i) and 25.4% (DPP4i) were rapid decliners (≥5 mL/min/1.73 m²/year). SGLT2i treatment was consistently associated with a slower eGFR decline than DPP4i, regardless of past eGFR slope. Post-treatment rapid eGFR decline decreased in both groups but remained higher in DPP4i users (20.5% vs. 15.4%). Those patients with past rapid eGFR decline receiving DPP4i rather than receiving SGLT2i remained at a higher risk for major adverse kidney events (MAKE) (a sustained 50% reduction in follow-up eGFR or the development of ESKD) and post-treatment rapid eGFR decline. Compared to DPP4i, SGLT2i therapy overall was associated with lower risks of MAKE (HR: 0.77; [95% CI: 0.64-0.94]), abrupt kidney function decline (HR: 0.76; [95% CI: 0.60-0.97]), and persistent rapid eGFR decline (HR: 0.76; [95% CI: 0.68-0.84]), with treatment benefits across different past eGFR decline categories. No difference in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio deterioration was observed between groups. The treatment benefits of SGLT2i over DPP4i were consistent across varying past eGFR slopes examined as a continuous variable.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>SGLT2i therapy was associated with better kidney outcomes and slower eGFR decline than DPP4i regardless of prior rapid eGFR decline.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in endocrinology</journal><pagination>1647342</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12852007</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP4 inhibitors on major adverse kidney events in diabetic people with varied kidney function decline.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12852007</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kao YW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheng YW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chao TF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen SW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chan YH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP4 inhibitors on major adverse kidney events in diabetic people with varied kidney function decline.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The comparative kidney-protective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with varying past estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline rates remain unclear.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This retrospective study analyzed 4,011 propensity score-matched T2D people from a multi-center database, each with at least 2 years of eGFR data before therapy and 1 year of follow-up. The patients received either SGLT2i or DPP4i between June 2016 and December 2021.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among paired patients, 23.7% (SGLT2i) and 25.4% (DPP4i) were rapid decliners (≥5 mL/min/1.73 m²/year). SGLT2i treatment was consistently associated with a slower eGFR decline than DPP4i, regardless of past eGFR slope. Post-treatment rapid eGFR decline decreased in both groups but remained higher in DPP4i users (20.5% vs. 15.4%). Those patients with past rapid eGFR decline receiving DPP4i rather than receiving SGLT2i remained at a higher risk for major adverse kidney events (MAKE) (a sustained 50% reduction in follow-up eGFR or the development of ESKD) and post-treatment rapid eGFR decline. Compared to DPP4i, SGLT2i therapy overall was associated with lower risks of MAKE (HR: 0.77; [95% CI: 0.64-0.94]), abrupt kidney function decline (HR: 0.76; [95% CI: 0.60-0.97]), and persistent rapid eGFR decline (HR: 0.76; [95% CI: 0.68-0.84]), with treatment benefits across different past eGFR decline categories. No difference in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio deterioration was observed between groups. The treatment benefits of SGLT2i over DPP4i were consistent across varying past eGFR slopes examined as a continuous variable.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>SGLT2i therapy was associated with better kidney outcomes and slower eGFR decline than DPP4i regardless of prior rapid eGFR decline.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025</publication><modification>2026-06-19T05:01:35.141Z</modification><creation>2026-06-19T03:07:24.397Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12852007</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41625233</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fendo.2025.1647342</doi></cross_references></HashMap>