<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6</volume><submitter>Boggio A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The maturation of the midpalatal suture is a critical factor in determining the most appropriate maxillary expansion technique. Angelieri et al. introduced a CBCT-based staging system that shifted the focus from chronological age to individual anatomical assessment. However, inter-examiner variability and challenges in evaluating intermediate stages (C and D) have raised concerns about the diagnostic reliability of axial-only CBCT analysis. This study investigates whether the addition of standardized coronal CBCT sections to traditional axial assessment can improve diagnostic precision - particularly in borderline cases - by revealing morphological variations that may not be evident in axial views alone.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>34 CBCT scans were retrospectively a</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in oral health</journal><pagination>1630883</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12855418</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A new CBCT evaluation for individual assessment of midpalatal suture maturation: a retrospective analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12855418</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Vinci R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fiorillo G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boggio A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mandelli G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Castellana F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Razzani E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Manes Gravina B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gastaldi G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A new CBCT evaluation for individual assessment of midpalatal suture maturation: a retrospective analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The maturation of the midpalatal suture is a critical factor in determining the most appropriate maxillary expansion technique. Angelieri et al. introduced a CBCT-based staging system that shifted the focus from chronological age to individual anatomical assessment. However, inter-examiner variability and challenges in evaluating intermediate stages (C and D) have raised concerns about the diagnostic reliability of axial-only CBCT analysis. This study investigates whether the addition of standardized coronal CBCT sections to traditional axial assessment can improve diagnostic precision - particularly in borderline cases - by revealing morphological variations that may not be evident in axial views alone.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>34 CBCT scans were retrospectively a</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025</publication><modification>2026-06-19T05:01:23.901Z</modification><creation>2026-06-19T03:07:19.189Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12855418</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41625065</pubmed><doi>10.3389/froh.2025.1630883</doi></cross_references></HashMap>