<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(2)</volume><submitter>Planchard D</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The first-line (1L) standard of care for B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF)&lt;sup>V600E&lt;/sup>-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer is BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib with MEK inhibitor trametinib (D + T). Combination therapy with encorafenib and binimetinib (E + B) has recently demonstrated clinical benefit in this setting in the single-arm, phase II PHAROS trial. We evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of E + B versus D + T in 1L using an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison.&lt;h4>Material and methods&lt;/h4>Individual patient data for E + B from PHAROS were matched on validated adjustment factors to aggregate data for D + T from Study BRF113928. The relative efficacy and safety of E + B versus D + T were assessed using weighted Cox proportional hazards models for</pubmed_abstract><journal>ESMO open</journal><pagination>106051</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12865620</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus dabrafenib plus trametinib for the first-line treatment of patients with BRAF&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;V600E&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12865620</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Le Reun C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Macabeo B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grouin JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Planchard D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mazieres J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boussahoua M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luttenauer H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus dabrafenib plus trametinib for the first-line treatment of patients with BRAF&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;V600E&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The first-line (1L) standard of care for B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF)&lt;sup>V600E&lt;/sup>-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer is BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib with MEK inhibitor trametinib (D + T). Combination therapy with encorafenib and binimetinib (E + B) has recently demonstrated clinical benefit in this setting in the single-arm, phase II PHAROS trial. We evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of E + B versus D + T in 1L using an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison.&lt;h4>Material and methods&lt;/h4>Individual patient data for E + B from PHAROS were matched on validated adjustment factors to aggregate data for D + T from Study BRF113928. The relative efficacy and safety of E + B versus D + T were assessed using weighted Cox proportional hazards models for</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Jan</publication><modification>2026-07-15T12:07:28.817Z</modification><creation>2026-07-04T03:12:38.608Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12865620</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41604820</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.106051</doi></cross_references></HashMap>