<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>29(2)</volume><submitter>Zhang X</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Effective risk stratification is crucial for managing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study evaluated whether general-purpose large language models (LLMs) can reliably execute the complex clinical reasoning required for cardiovascular prognosis. We quantitatively assessed three LLMs-ChatGPT 4o, DeepSeek R1, and Grok 3-for predicting one-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), using 29 guideline-recommended features from 903 participants in the LM-ACS cohort and 64 participants in the MIMIC database. All models demonstrated significant risk overestimation and substantial output variability across ten independent runs. Although Grok 3 showed the highest initial accuracy, its average performance over all runs showed no significant difference. ROC analysis indicated that none of </pubmed_abstract><journal>iScience</journal><pagination>114644</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12874424</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Large language models for predicting one-year major adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12874424</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Zheng Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lai F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hu K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hou S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tian P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Su G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Large language models for predicting one-year major adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome.</name><description>Effective risk stratification is crucial for managing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study evaluated whether general-purpose large language models (LLMs) can reliably execute the complex clinical reasoning required for cardiovascular prognosis. We quantitatively assessed three LLMs-ChatGPT 4o, DeepSeek R1, and Grok 3-for predicting one-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), using 29 guideline-recommended features from 903 participants in the LM-ACS cohort and 64 participants in the MIMIC database. All models demonstrated significant risk overestimation and substantial output variability across ten independent runs. Although Grok 3 showed the highest initial accuracy, its average performance over all runs showed no significant difference. ROC analysis indicated that none of </description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Feb</publication><modification>2026-07-15T13:24:42.845Z</modification><creation>2026-07-05T03:08:23.549Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12874424</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41660250</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.isci.2026.114644</doi></cross_references></HashMap>