<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>18(3)</volume><submitter>Jung J</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Second salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (SAT) is a therapeutic option for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapse after a first autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the era of novel agents. However, the clinical context in which SAT provides benefit relative to contemporary salvage regimens remains unclear.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients who underwent SAT after novel agent-based induction and first ASCT, and salvage re-induction, and compared outcomes with 113 patients treated with salvage carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) without SAT.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Median interval from first ASCT to relapse was 27 months. In the SAT cohort, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from initiation o</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancers</journal><pagination>471</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12896849</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Second Salvage Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: Results of the KMM2301 Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12896849</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Jung SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eom HS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kang HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP)</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Min CK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yoo KH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Byun JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yoon DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee MW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jo JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cho H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yi JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yoon SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee WS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Do YR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shin HJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Second Salvage Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: Results of the KMM2301 Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Second salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (SAT) is a therapeutic option for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapse after a first autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the era of novel agents. However, the clinical context in which SAT provides benefit relative to contemporary salvage regimens remains unclear.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients who underwent SAT after novel agent-based induction and first ASCT, and salvage re-induction, and compared outcomes with 113 patients treated with salvage carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) without SAT.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Median interval from first ASCT to relapse was 27 months. In the SAT cohort, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from initiation o</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Jan</publication><modification>2026-07-08T03:14:00.26Z</modification><creation>2026-07-08T03:08:34.542Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12896849</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41681943</pubmed><doi>10.3390/cancers18030471</doi></cross_references></HashMap>