<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Woyach JA</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), has shown efficacy and safety in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) who received prior covalent BTKi. We report results, to our knowledge, from the first randomized head-to-head comparison of pirtobrutinib versus ibrutinib in BTKi-naïve CLL/SLL in both treatment-naïve (TN) patients and patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4&gt;Patients (N = 662) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pirtobrutinib or ibrutinib. All patients were BTKi-naïve. Primary end points were overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) among all randomly assigned patients (intention to treat [ITT]) and in patients wi</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology</journal><pagination>JCO2502477</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12904240</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Pirtobrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Treatment-Naive and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12904240</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Agajanian R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eom KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Woyach JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ozcan M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Qiu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berkovits A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bao K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bian Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hill M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhandari NR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leow CC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coombs CC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Panovska A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wrobel T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lewis KL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Batista Ribeiro SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grosicki S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Czyz J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Capra M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laribi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruppert AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cramer P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jurczak W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacobasch L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lepretre S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wierda WG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baker R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Pirtobrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Treatment-Naive and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), has shown efficacy and safety in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) who received prior covalent BTKi. We report results, to our knowledge, from the first randomized head-to-head comparison of pirtobrutinib versus ibrutinib in BTKi-naïve CLL/SLL in both treatment-naïve (TN) patients and patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4&gt;Patients (N = 662) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pirtobrutinib or ibrutinib. All patients were BTKi-naïve. Primary end points were overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) among all randomly assigned patients (intention to treat [ITT]) and in patients wi</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-07-15T22:02:26.777Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T13:09:31.896Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12904240</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41353787</pubmed><doi>10.1200/JCO-25-02477</doi></cross_references></HashMap>