<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(1)</volume><submitter>Yodying H</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Delayed bleeding remains the most common adverse event after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We assessed whether prophylactic mechanical closure is associated with reduced clinically significant delayed bleeding.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through October 2025. Comparative studies reporting delayed bleeding within 30 days were included. Random-effects meta-analysis with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was applied. Evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Nine studies (2646 patients; eight non-randomized) met inclusion criteria. Prophylactic closure was associated with reduced delayed bleeding (risk ratio [RR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.82; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> </pubmed_abstract><journal>DEN open</journal><pagination>e70299</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12906296</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Prophylactic Mechanical Closure for Preventing Delayed Bleeding after Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12906296</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Prapasajchavet W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boonsinsukh T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petchkaewkul P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laojanun R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rookkachart T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sathornviriyapong S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mekrugsakit N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chartkitcharoen A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Viriyaroj V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yodying H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Prophylactic Mechanical Closure for Preventing Delayed Bleeding after Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Delayed bleeding remains the most common adverse event after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We assessed whether prophylactic mechanical closure is associated with reduced clinically significant delayed bleeding.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through October 2025. Comparative studies reporting delayed bleeding within 30 days were included. Random-effects meta-analysis with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was applied. Evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Nine studies (2646 patients; eight non-randomized) met inclusion criteria. Prophylactic closure was associated with reduced delayed bleeding (risk ratio [RR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.82; &lt;i>p&lt;/i> </description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Apr</publication><modification>2026-07-15T22:15:54.761Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T10:20:53.785Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12906296</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41693739</pubmed><doi>10.1002/deo2.70299</doi></cross_references></HashMap>