<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Elfer K</submitter><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>US FDA</funding><pagination>100439</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12908141</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>37(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>This work puts forth and demonstrates the utility of a reporting framework for collecting and evaluating annotations of medical images used for training and testing artificial intelligence (AI) models in assisting detection and diagnosis. AI has unique reporting requirements, as shown by the AI extensions to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklists and the proposed AI extensions to the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) and Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklists. AI for detection and/or diagnostic image analysis requires complete, reproducible, and transparent reporting of the annotations and</pubmed_abstract><journal>Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc</journal><pubmed_title>Reproducible Reporting of the Collection and Evaluation of Annotations for Artificial Intelligence Models.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12908141</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R37 CA225655</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 HL007974</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Birmingham R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dudgeon SN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pan T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ehinger A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ly A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wen S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gardecki E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hytopoulos E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blenman KRM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elfer K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hanna MG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gallas BD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Green U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lennerz JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salgado R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peeters DJE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saltz J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Reproducible Reporting of the Collection and Evaluation of Annotations for Artificial Intelligence Models.</name><description>This work puts forth and demonstrates the utility of a reporting framework for collecting and evaluating annotations of medical images used for training and testing artificial intelligence (AI) models in assisting detection and diagnosis. AI has unique reporting requirements, as shown by the AI extensions to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklists and the proposed AI extensions to the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) and Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklists. AI for detection and/or diagnostic image analysis requires complete, reproducible, and transparent reporting of the annotations and</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Apr</publication><modification>2026-07-16T05:12:00.787Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T10:36:50.322Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12908141</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38286221</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100439</doi></cross_references></HashMap>