{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["29(1)"],"submitter":["Wolff I"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Despite the relatively low infection rate following transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB), it remains unresolved whether periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) can be omitted. Our aim was to compare infectious complications (genitourinary infections/GUI, fever, sepsis, readmission rate, 30-day-mortality) following TPB, considering all studies of varying levels of evidence that enable a direct comparison between patients with and without PAP.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a comprehensive search in PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, as well as grey literature sources, to identify reports published until January 2024. All studies comparing the incidence of infectious endpoints following TPB with vs. without PAP were included in the analyses. Th"],"journal":["Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases"],"pagination":["47-56"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12909119"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Infectious complications following transperineal prostate biopsy with or without periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis-a systematic review including meta-analysis of all comparative studies."],"pmcid":["PMC12909119"],"pubmed_authors":["Pilatz A","Gilfrich C","Wolff I","May M","Burchardt M","Buchner M","Abele-Horn M","Wagenlehner F","Hauner K","Wullich B"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Infectious complications following transperineal prostate biopsy with or without periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis-a systematic review including meta-analysis of all comparative studies.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Despite the relatively low infection rate following transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB), it remains unresolved whether periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) can be omitted. Our aim was to compare infectious complications (genitourinary infections/GUI, fever, sepsis, readmission rate, 30-day-mortality) following TPB, considering all studies of varying levels of evidence that enable a direct comparison between patients with and without PAP.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a comprehensive search in PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, as well as grey literature sources, to identify reports published until January 2024. All studies comparing the incidence of infectious endpoints following TPB with vs. without PAP were included in the analyses. Th","dates":{"release":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2026 Mar","modification":"2026-07-16T05:14:44.594Z","creation":"2026-07-09T10:38:22.591Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC12909119","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39741175"],"doi":["10.1038/s41391-024-00934-9"]}}