<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14(2)</volume><submitter>Moravej H</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Limited durability of clinical responses remains a major challenge in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy. CAR-enhancers (CAR-Es), which fuse tumor antigens to interleukin (IL)-2 muteins, provide a targeted strategy to enhance CAR-T persistence and function. It remained unclear whether CAR-Es are effective across distinct tumor contexts, when using patient-derived T cells, or in preventing exhaustion and sustaining persistence. It was also unknown whether CAR-Es can selectively expand CAR-Ts in humanized mice with pre-existing T cells, and to what extent their efficacy depends on IL-2Rβγ vs IL-2Rα engagement. While IL-2Rα (CD25) has been classically linked to potent antitumor responses and memory formation, it also drives IL-2-associated toxicities, including vascu</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal for immunotherapy of cancer</journal><pagination>e013665</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12918668</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Antigen-IL-2 CAR-enhancer drives CAR-T fate and stemness, enhancing antitumor efficacy across models independent of IL-2Rα.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12918668</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Moravej H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rivet VM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nia HT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fulciniti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kowalewski A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nadeem O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berland L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mantri SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Munshi NC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khan RMM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacobson CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baral J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marcandalli E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Munaretto LA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee UJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wolff AN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gabr Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taklifi P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sperling AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hemann M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allen HH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nili A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Farkash Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mercadante D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Louis BBV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rashidian M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rakhshandehroo T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Regan K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Antigen-IL-2 CAR-enhancer drives CAR-T fate and stemness, enhancing antitumor efficacy across models independent of IL-2Rα.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Limited durability of clinical responses remains a major challenge in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy. CAR-enhancers (CAR-Es), which fuse tumor antigens to interleukin (IL)-2 muteins, provide a targeted strategy to enhance CAR-T persistence and function. It remained unclear whether CAR-Es are effective across distinct tumor contexts, when using patient-derived T cells, or in preventing exhaustion and sustaining persistence. It was also unknown whether CAR-Es can selectively expand CAR-Ts in humanized mice with pre-existing T cells, and to what extent their efficacy depends on IL-2Rβγ vs IL-2Rα engagement. While IL-2Rα (CD25) has been classically linked to potent antitumor responses and memory formation, it also drives IL-2-associated toxicities, including vascu</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Feb</publication><modification>2026-07-16T09:17:29.707Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T10:46:51.594Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12918668</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41708145</pubmed><doi>10.1136/jitc-2025-013665</doi></cross_references></HashMap>