<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Hsu CC</submitter><funding>Taipei Veterans General Hospital</funding><funding>National Science and Technology Council</funding><funding>Gilead Sciences</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are first-line nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Real-world monitoring of patients on these agents and their comparative renal safety remain poorly characterized. We evaluated guideline-adherent monitoring practices and compared renal dysfunction risk across ETV, TDF, and TAF.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We retrospectively analyzed patients with CHB who initiated ETV, TDF, or TAF between 2012 and 2022. Levels of serum alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, albumin, serum creatinine, hepatitis B virus DNA, and abdominal sonograms were assessed every 6 months during the 36 months of NA treatment. Incidence rates and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for renal dysfunction were </pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical and translational gastroenterology</journal><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12922928</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Monitoring Adherence and Renal Safety of Nucleos(t)ide Analogs for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12922928</pmcid><funding_grant_id>V111B-043, V111EA-017, V113C-141, V114C-234, V115C-246, Center of Excellence for Cancer Research MOHW112-TDU-B-221-124007, Y.L. Lin Hung Tai Education Foundation, and Big Data Center.</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CO-TW-988-6355</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MOST 111-2635-B-075-001, NSTC 112-2314-B-075-043-MY2</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Chou CY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hsu CC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang YL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chou YC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Su CW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen ZE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hou MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chao FH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Monitoring Adherence and Renal Safety of Nucleos(t)ide Analogs for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are first-line nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Real-world monitoring of patients on these agents and their comparative renal safety remain poorly characterized. We evaluated guideline-adherent monitoring practices and compared renal dysfunction risk across ETV, TDF, and TAF.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We retrospectively analyzed patients with CHB who initiated ETV, TDF, or TAF between 2012 and 2022. Levels of serum alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, albumin, serum creatinine, hepatitis B virus DNA, and abdominal sonograms were assessed every 6 months during the 36 months of NA treatment. Incidence rates and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for renal dysfunction were </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-07-16T12:57:28.17Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T10:56:37.695Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12922928</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41363729</pubmed><doi>10.14309/ctg.0000000000000962</doi></cross_references></HashMap>