<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(2)</volume><submitter>Batten JN</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Professional society policy statements recommend that clinicians limit (ie, withhold or withdraw) potentially nonbeneficial life-prolonging interventions by (1) achieving a shared decision with patients or surrogates or (2) initiating an institutional process to address disagreement with patients or surrogates. However, in the context of a health care system with a default tendency toward life prolongation, it is unclear whether clinicians rely entirely on these recommended approaches or resort to alternate approaches.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To characterize the range of decision-making approaches clinicians report using to limit potentially nonbeneficial life-prolonging interventions.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This qualitative study was conducted at 3 tertiary a</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA network open</journal><pagination>e2560260</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12924098</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Decision-Making Approaches Used to Limit Potentially Nonbeneficial Life-Prolonging Interventions.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12924098</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Nichol AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Batten JN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dzeng EW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chernicoff HO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blythe JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Axelrod JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kruser JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weiss Goitiandia S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pereira LM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Decision-Making Approaches Used to Limit Potentially Nonbeneficial Life-Prolonging Interventions.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Professional society policy statements recommend that clinicians limit (ie, withhold or withdraw) potentially nonbeneficial life-prolonging interventions by (1) achieving a shared decision with patients or surrogates or (2) initiating an institutional process to address disagreement with patients or surrogates. However, in the context of a health care system with a default tendency toward life prolongation, it is unclear whether clinicians rely entirely on these recommended approaches or resort to alternate approaches.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To characterize the range of decision-making approaches clinicians report using to limit potentially nonbeneficial life-prolonging interventions.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This qualitative study was conducted at 3 tertiary a</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Feb</publication><modification>2026-07-16T14:53:21.346Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T11:01:05.1Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12924098</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41719039</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.60260</doi></cross_references></HashMap>