<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Yildiz Y</submitter><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><pagination>1715506</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12929515</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>8</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Transformer-based models have shown strong potential for clinical prediction using electronic health record data, yet their performance can vary depending on modelling decisions and data characteristics.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this study, we trained a BEHRT model on hospital-based UK Biobank data and evaluated its performance across four clinical prediction tasks, including next-visit diagnosis and longer-term diagnosis prediction up to five years. We exhaustively assessed the impact of model size, medical terminology (CALIBER vs ICD-10), and data split strategies.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The large model consistently outperformed the smaller one in long-term prediction tasks (AUROC = 0.874 vs 0.858 at 5 years), while differences were marginal in 6-months prediction tasks. Performanc</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in digital health</journal><pubmed_title>Extending BEHRT to UK Biobank: assessing transformer model performance in clinical prediction.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12929515</pmcid><funding_grant_id>NIHR301413</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Jenkins DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yildiz Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nenadic G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jani M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Extending BEHRT to UK Biobank: assessing transformer model performance in clinical prediction.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Transformer-based models have shown strong potential for clinical prediction using electronic health record data, yet their performance can vary depending on modelling decisions and data characteristics.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this study, we trained a BEHRT model on hospital-based UK Biobank data and evaluated its performance across four clinical prediction tasks, including next-visit diagnosis and longer-term diagnosis prediction up to five years. We exhaustively assessed the impact of model size, medical terminology (CALIBER vs ICD-10), and data split strategies.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The large model consistently outperformed the smaller one in long-term prediction tasks (AUROC = 0.874 vs 0.858 at 5 years), while differences were marginal in 6-months prediction tasks. Performanc</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026</publication><modification>2026-07-16T22:08:08.881Z</modification><creation>2026-07-11T03:11:59.357Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12929515</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41743675</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fdgth.2026.1715506</doi></cross_references></HashMap>