{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Merle JL"],"funding":["Clinical and Translational Sciences Awards","NCATS NIH HHS","U.S. National Library of Medicine","Clinical and Translational Science Awards","National Cancer Institute","NCI NIH HHS"],"pagination":["41"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12934111"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["7(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>The Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) is designed to capture determinants of sustainable clinical practices over time. Although the full 49-item CSAT instrument has demonstrated strong psychometric properties, the 21-item short form has had limited evaluation. This study aimed to assess the CSAT short form (CSAT Short) across different respondent characteristics and care delivery settings.<h4>Methods</h4>We evaluated the CSAT Short in a sample of healthcare personnel (N = 256 respondents) drawn from across three hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies in a research consortium, all of which tested routine symptom surveillance and integration of symptom management interventions in ambulatory oncology care settings in the US. Confirmatory factor analyses (CF"],"journal":["Implementation science communications"],"pubmed_title":["Psychometric properties of the Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) short form across three research centers evaluating effectiveness and implementation of a cancer symptom surveillance and management intervention."],"pmcid":["PMC12934111"],"funding_grant_id":["T15LM007124","UM1CA233080","UL1 TR001422","UL1TR002541","UL1TR002377","UM1CA233033","UM1CA233035","U24CA232980"],"pubmed_authors":["Griffin J","Mitchell SA","O'Connor M","Herrin J","Paudel R","McCleary NJ","IMPACT Consortium","Mai QH","Ahrens P","Yanez B","Wehbe F","Bian JJ","Uno H","Poirier-Shelton T","Austin JD","Coughlin A","Dizon DS","Cronin C","Hemming K","Richardson J","Kroner BL","Garcia S","Richardson K","Garcia M","Mallow J","Schrag D","Rahman P","Hodgdon C","Tyndall BD","Osarogiagbon RU","Cella D","Caron K","Faris N","Redmond S","Tesch N","Bass M","Ardini MA","Popovic J","Kroenke K","Tofthagen C","Begnoche M","Reich J","Wong SL","Podratz J","Tasker L","Cahue S","Smith AW","Penedo F","Tramontano A","Jensen R","Smith JD","Flores AM","DiMartino L","Weiner B","Lancki N","Hazard-Jenkins HW","Preiss L","Hassett MJ","Schaepe K","Pachman D","Cheville AL","Kuharic M","Norton WE","Lam V","Silberman P","Dias S","Merle JL","Ridgeway JL","Ruddy K","Chlan L","Simpson J","Kircher S","Pearson L"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Psychometric properties of the Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) short form across three research centers evaluating effectiveness and implementation of a cancer symptom surveillance and management intervention.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>The Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) is designed to capture determinants of sustainable clinical practices over time. Although the full 49-item CSAT instrument has demonstrated strong psychometric properties, the 21-item short form has had limited evaluation. This study aimed to assess the CSAT short form (CSAT Short) across different respondent characteristics and care delivery settings.<h4>Methods</h4>We evaluated the CSAT Short in a sample of healthcare personnel (N = 256 respondents) drawn from across three hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies in a research consortium, all of which tested routine symptom surveillance and integration of symptom management interventions in ambulatory oncology care settings in the US. Confirmatory factor analyses (CF","dates":{"release":"2026-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2026 Jan","modification":"2026-07-16T21:36:30.479Z","creation":"2026-07-10T03:15:26.97Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC12934111","cross_references":{"pubmed":["41612516"],"doi":["10.1186/s43058-026-00867-5"]}}