<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>650(8103)</volume><submitter>Asai A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Scientific progress depends on the ability of researchers to synthesize the growing body of literature. Can large language models (LLMs) assist scientists in this task? Here we introduce OpenScholar, a specialized retrieval-augmented language model (LM)&lt;sup>1&lt;/sup> that answers scientific queries by identifying relevant passages from 45 million open-access papers and synthesizing citation-backed responses. To evaluate OpenScholar, we develop ScholarQABench, the first large-scale multi-domain benchmark for literature search, comprising 2,967 expert-written queries and 208 long-form answers across computer science, physics, neuroscience and biomedicine. Despite being a smaller open model, OpenScholar-8B outperforms GPT-4o by 6.1% and PaperQA2 by 5.5% in correctness on a challenging multi-paper synthesis task from the new ScholarQABench. Although GPT-4o hallucinates citations 78-90% of the time, OpenScholar achieves citation accuracy on par with human experts. OpenScholar's data store, retriever and self-feedback inference loop improve off-the-shelf LMs: for instance, OpenScholar-GPT-4o improves the correctness of GPT-4o by 12%. In human evaluations, experts preferred OpenScholar-8B and OpenScholar-GPT-4o responses over expert-written ones 51% and 70% of the time, respectively, compared with 32% for GPT-4o. We open-source all artefacts, including our code, models, data store, datasets and a public demo.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nature</journal><pagination>857-863</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12935541</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Synthesizing scientific literature with retrieval-augmented language models.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12935541</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Koh PW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neubig G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shi W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xiong Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Latzke M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yih WT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>D'Arcy M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feldman S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hajishirzi H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tong H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shao R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zettlemoyer L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tian M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Soldaini L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Downey D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lo K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ji P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wadden D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hwang JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Asai A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sparks J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kishore V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weld DS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Synthesizing scientific literature with retrieval-augmented language models.</name><description>Scientific progress depends on the ability of researchers to synthesize the growing body of literature. Can large language models (LLMs) assist scientists in this task? Here we introduce OpenScholar, a specialized retrieval-augmented language model (LM)&lt;sup>1&lt;/sup> that answers scientific queries by identifying relevant passages from 45 million open-access papers and synthesizing citation-backed responses. To evaluate OpenScholar, we develop ScholarQABench, the first large-scale multi-domain benchmark for literature search, comprising 2,967 expert-written queries and 208 long-form answers across computer science, physics, neuroscience and biomedicine. Despite being a smaller open model, OpenScholar-8B outperforms GPT-4o by 6.1% and PaperQA2 by 5.5% in correctness on a challenging multi-paper synthesis task from the new ScholarQABench. Although GPT-4o hallucinates citations 78-90% of the time, OpenScholar achieves citation accuracy on par with human experts. OpenScholar's data store, retriever and self-feedback inference loop improve off-the-shelf LMs: for instance, OpenScholar-GPT-4o improves the correctness of GPT-4o by 12%. In human evaluations, experts preferred OpenScholar-8B and OpenScholar-GPT-4o responses over expert-written ones 51% and 70% of the time, respectively, compared with 32% for GPT-4o. We open-source all artefacts, including our code, models, data store, datasets and a public demo.</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Feb</publication><modification>2026-07-11T03:18:15.057Z</modification><creation>2026-07-11T03:12:04.547Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12935541</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41639446</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41586-025-10072-4</doi></cross_references></HashMap>