<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(2)</volume><submitter>Udovicich C</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy (HDR-BT) are options for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. However, no prospective evidence is available to compare these modalities.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To compare the biochemical failure (BCF), late patient-reported quality of life (PR-QoL), and acute and late adverse events (AEs) associated with SBRT and HDR-BT using prospective data.&lt;h4>Data sources&lt;/h4>This was an individual patient data post hoc pooled analysis of 5 prospective trials with recruitment from 2010 to 2018. Statistical analyses were performed in September 2024.&lt;h4>Study selection&lt;/h4>This was a post hoc analysis of these 5 sprospective trials. Eligibility criteria comprised men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer underg</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA network open</journal><pagination>e260146</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12936880</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>SBRT vs HDR Brachytherapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12936880</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ong WL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGuffin M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loblaw A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chu W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Detsky J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morton G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kulasingham-Poon M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheung P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Udovicich C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hudson JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chung H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tseng CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kennedy T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deabreu A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vesprini D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ravi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davidson M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mamedov A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Helou J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>SBRT vs HDR Brachytherapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy (HDR-BT) are options for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. However, no prospective evidence is available to compare these modalities.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To compare the biochemical failure (BCF), late patient-reported quality of life (PR-QoL), and acute and late adverse events (AEs) associated with SBRT and HDR-BT using prospective data.&lt;h4>Data sources&lt;/h4>This was an individual patient data post hoc pooled analysis of 5 prospective trials with recruitment from 2010 to 2018. Statistical analyses were performed in September 2024.&lt;h4>Study selection&lt;/h4>This was a post hoc analysis of these 5 sprospective trials. Eligibility criteria comprised men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer underg</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Feb</publication><modification>2026-07-16T22:07:50.405Z</modification><creation>2026-07-11T03:11:51.065Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12936880</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41739470</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.0146</doi></cross_references></HashMap>