<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Bikdeli B</submitter><funding>American Heart Association-American Stroke Association</funding><funding>American Heart Association Inc</funding><pagination>556-564</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12945443</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>23(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Many research investigations for pulmonary embolism (PE) rely on the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for analyses of electronic databases. The validity of ICD-10 codes in identifying PE remains uncertain.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The objective of this study was to validate an algorithm to efficiently identify pulmonary embolism using ICD-10 codes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Using a prespecified protocol, patients in the Mass General-Brigham hospitals (2016-2021) with ICD-10 principal discharge codes for PE, those with secondary codes for PE, and those without PE codes were identified (n = 578 from each group). Weighting was applied to represent each group proportionate to their true prevalence. The accuracy of ICD-10 codes for identifying PE was compar</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH</journal><pubmed_title>Validating International Classification of Diseases Code 10th Revision algorithms for accurate identification of pulmonary embolism.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12945443</pmcid><funding_grant_id>938814</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Mojibian H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barco S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mahajan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bejjani A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lo YC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khera R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krumholz HM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aneja S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goldhaber SZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aghayev A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Klok FA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krishnathasan D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zarghami M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rashedi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Secemsky EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Appah-Sampong A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Monreal M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jimenez JV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hunsaker AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caraballo C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>PE-EHR+ Investigators</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Piazza G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bikdeli B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jimenez D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muriel A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khairani CD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Konstantinides S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hussain MA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Validating International Classification of Diseases Code 10th Revision algorithms for accurate identification of pulmonary embolism.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Many research investigations for pulmonary embolism (PE) rely on the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for analyses of electronic databases. The validity of ICD-10 codes in identifying PE remains uncertain.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The objective of this study was to validate an algorithm to efficiently identify pulmonary embolism using ICD-10 codes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Using a prespecified protocol, patients in the Mass General-Brigham hospitals (2016-2021) with ICD-10 principal discharge codes for PE, those with secondary codes for PE, and those without PE codes were identified (n = 578 from each group). Weighting was applied to represent each group proportionate to their true prevalence. The accuracy of ICD-10 codes for identifying PE was compar</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Feb</publication><modification>2026-07-16T22:06:23.475Z</modification><creation>2026-07-11T03:11:39.44Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12945443</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39505153</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jtha.2024.10.013</doi></cross_references></HashMap>