<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>56(3)</volume><submitter>Hata A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Recent randomized controlled trials have shown the non-inferiority of sublobar-to-lobar resection for small peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, whether wedge resection (WR) or anatomical segmentectomy (SG) is superior remains unclear. We hypothesized that ground-glass opacity (GGO) is associated with the outcomes of WR and SG.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between 2010 and 2022, 219 consecutive patients with clinical stage IA peripheral NSCLC who underwent sublobar resection for frailty at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the high-resolution computed tomography findings, the tumors were classified into two groups: part-solid (GGO (+)) and solid (GGO (-)). The long-term outcomes were compared between the WR and SG groups.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In the par</pubmed_abstract><journal>Surgery today</journal><pagination>301-310</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12946241</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Wedge resection versus segmentectomy in peripheral clinical stage IA lung cancer concerning ground-glass opacity.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12946241</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Iwata T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ito T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yamamoto T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Otani Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sakairi Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sato Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hata A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Wedge resection versus segmentectomy in peripheral clinical stage IA lung cancer concerning ground-glass opacity.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Recent randomized controlled trials have shown the non-inferiority of sublobar-to-lobar resection for small peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, whether wedge resection (WR) or anatomical segmentectomy (SG) is superior remains unclear. We hypothesized that ground-glass opacity (GGO) is associated with the outcomes of WR and SG.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between 2010 and 2022, 219 consecutive patients with clinical stage IA peripheral NSCLC who underwent sublobar resection for frailty at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the high-resolution computed tomography findings, the tumors were classified into two groups: part-solid (GGO (+)) and solid (GGO (-)). The long-term outcomes were compared between the WR and SG groups.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In the par</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Mar</publication><modification>2026-07-16T22:15:12.162Z</modification><creation>2026-07-12T03:08:48.688Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12946241</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40982056</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00595-025-03137-4</doi></cross_references></HashMap>