<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Shimizu A</submitter><funding>The Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development</funding><pagination>498-506</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12950100</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>30(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Although proteinuria is a key prognostic marker in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), the optimal post-biopsy timing for its assessment remains uncertain, particularly given variability in treatment type and timing. Using longitudinal data from the Japan IgA Nephropathy Prospective Cohort Study (J-IGACS), we sought to identify the post-biopsy time point at which proteinuria most reliably predicts kidney outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Proteinuria was assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after biopsy. The primary outcome was defined as a ≥ 50% increase in serum creatinine or initiation of kidney replacement therapy in adults (≥ 20 years) and as a ≥ 25% decline in eGFR or initiation of kidney replacement therapy in patients aged &lt; 20 years. Model performance was</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical and experimental nephrology</journal><pubmed_title>Post-biopsy proteinuria as a universal prognostic marker across diverse clinical courses in IgA nephropathy.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12950100</pmcid><funding_grant_id>JP19ek0109261</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Tomino Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miura K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ito T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kikuchi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yokoo T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Honma S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Joh K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>J-IGACS working group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miyazaki Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sasaki T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ichikawa D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kawamura T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Katafuchi R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hashiguchi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suzuki H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shirai S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shibata T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shimizu A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suzuki Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yasuda T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Takahashi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ueda H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nishikawa M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakatani S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yasuda Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hataya H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aoki R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fujimoto S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hirano K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sanada S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matsuzaki K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muta K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fukao Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nihei Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Okabe M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moriyama T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakanishi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fukuda A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sakaguchi R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shima Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kihara M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tsuboi N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yokote S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nishino T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koike K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Urushihara M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Post-biopsy proteinuria as a universal prognostic marker across diverse clinical courses in IgA nephropathy.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Although proteinuria is a key prognostic marker in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), the optimal post-biopsy timing for its assessment remains uncertain, particularly given variability in treatment type and timing. Using longitudinal data from the Japan IgA Nephropathy Prospective Cohort Study (J-IGACS), we sought to identify the post-biopsy time point at which proteinuria most reliably predicts kidney outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Proteinuria was assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after biopsy. The primary outcome was defined as a ≥ 50% increase in serum creatinine or initiation of kidney replacement therapy in adults (≥ 20 years) and as a ≥ 25% decline in eGFR or initiation of kidney replacement therapy in patients aged &lt; 20 years. Model performance was</description><dates><release>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2026 Mar</publication><modification>2026-07-17T01:11:02.124Z</modification><creation>2026-07-12T03:13:07.69Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12950100</accession><cross_references><pubmed>41636940</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s10157-025-02808-3</doi></cross_references></HashMap>