{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["320(7232)"],"submitter":["Grant C"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare outcome and resource utilisation among patients referred to the Amalthea Project, a liaison organisation that facilitates contact between voluntary organisations and patients in primary care, with patients receiving routine general practitioner care.<h4>Design</h4>Randomised controlled trial with follow up at one and four months.<h4>Setting</h4>26 general practices in Avon.<h4>Participants</h4>161 patients identified by their general practitioner as having psychosocial problems.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Primary outcomes were psychological wellbeing (assessed with the hospital anxiety and depression scale) and social support (assessed using the Duke-UNC functional social support questionnaire). Secondary outcomes were quality of life measures (the Dartmouth"],"journal":["BMJ (Clinical research ed.)"],"pagination":["419-23"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC27287"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a referrals facilitator between primary care and the voluntary sector."],"pmcid":["PMC27287"],"pubmed_authors":["Goodenough T","Grant C","Harvey I","Hine C"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a referrals facilitator between primary care and the voluntary sector.","description":"<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare outcome and resource utilisation among patients referred to the Amalthea Project, a liaison organisation that facilitates contact between voluntary organisations and patients in primary care, with patients receiving routine general practitioner care.<h4>Design</h4>Randomised controlled trial with follow up at one and four months.<h4>Setting</h4>26 general practices in Avon.<h4>Participants</h4>161 patients identified by their general practitioner as having psychosocial problems.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Primary outcomes were psychological wellbeing (assessed with the hospital anxiety and depression scale) and social support (assessed using the Duke-UNC functional social support questionnaire). Secondary outcomes were quality of life measures (the Dartmouth","dates":{"release":"2000-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2000 Feb","modification":"2025-05-18T11:22:06.5Z","creation":"2025-05-18T11:22:06.5Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC27287","cross_references":{"pubmed":["10669447"],"doi":["10.1136/bmj.320.7232.419"]}}