<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>320(7232)</volume><submitter>Grant C</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To compare outcome and resource utilisation among patients referred to the Amalthea Project, a liaison organisation that facilitates contact between voluntary organisations and patients in primary care, with patients receiving routine general practitioner care.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Randomised controlled trial with follow up at one and four months.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>26 general practices in Avon.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>161 patients identified by their general practitioner as having psychosocial problems.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Primary outcomes were psychological wellbeing (assessed with the hospital anxiety and depression scale) and social support (assessed using the Duke-UNC functional social support questionnaire). Secondary outcomes were quality of life measures (the Dartmouth</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ (Clinical research ed.)</journal><pagination>419-23</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC27287</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a referrals facilitator between primary care and the voluntary sector.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC27287</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Goodenough T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grant C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harvey I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hine C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a referrals facilitator between primary care and the voluntary sector.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To compare outcome and resource utilisation among patients referred to the Amalthea Project, a liaison organisation that facilitates contact between voluntary organisations and patients in primary care, with patients receiving routine general practitioner care.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Randomised controlled trial with follow up at one and four months.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>26 general practices in Avon.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>161 patients identified by their general practitioner as having psychosocial problems.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Primary outcomes were psychological wellbeing (assessed with the hospital anxiety and depression scale) and social support (assessed using the Duke-UNC functional social support questionnaire). Secondary outcomes were quality of life measures (the Dartmouth</description><dates><release>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2000 Feb</publication><modification>2025-05-18T11:22:06.5Z</modification><creation>2025-05-18T11:22:06.5Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC27287</accession><cross_references><pubmed>10669447</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmj.320.7232.419</doi></cross_references></HashMap>