<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hendricks AE</submitter><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>S100</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC2795871</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>3 Suppl 7</volume><pubmed_abstract>Over the past decade, genetic analysis has shifted from linkage studies, which identify broad regions containing putative trait loci, to genome-wide association studies, which detect the association of a marker with a specific phenotype. Because linkage and association analysis provide complementary information, developing a method to combine these analyses may increase the power to detect a true association. In this paper we compare a linkage score and association score test as well as a newly proposed combination of these two scores with traditional linkage and association methods.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC proceedings</journal><pubmed_title>Genome-wide association and linkage analysis of quantitative traits: comparison of likelihood-ratio test and conditional score statistic.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC2795871</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 GM031575-28</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 GM031575</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Dupuis J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hendricks AE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Genome-wide association and linkage analysis of quantitative traits: comparison of likelihood-ratio test and conditional score statistic.</name><description>Over the past decade, genetic analysis has shifted from linkage studies, which identify broad regions containing putative trait loci, to genome-wide association studies, which detect the association of a marker with a specific phenotype. Because linkage and association analysis provide complementary information, developing a method to combine these analyses may increase the power to detect a true association. In this paper we compare a linkage score and association score test as well as a newly proposed combination of these two scores with traditional linkage and association methods.</description><dates><release>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2009 Dec</publication><modification>2024-11-09T17:06:03.693Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T00:27:28Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC2795871</accession><cross_references><pubmed>20017964</pubmed><doi>10.1186/1753-6561-3-s7-s100</doi></cross_references></HashMap>