<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Writing Committee</submitter><funding>NEI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>998-1004.e6</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC2864338</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>117(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine whether visual acuity improvement with Bangerter filters is similar to improvement with patching as initial therapy for children with moderate amblyopia.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Randomized, clinical trial.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>We enrolled 186 children, 3 to &lt;10 years old, with moderate amblyopia (20/40-20/80).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Children were randomly assigned to receive either daily patching or to use a Bangerter filter on the spectacle lens in front of the fellow eye. Study visits were scheduled at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Visual acuity in amblyopic eyes at 24 weeks.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>At 24 weeks, amblyopic eye improvement averaged 1.9 lines in the Bangerter group and 2.3 lines in the patching group (difference in mean visual acuities between gro</pubmed_abstract><journal>Ophthalmology</journal><pubmed_title>A randomized trial comparing Bangerter filters and patching for the treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC2864338</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U10 EY011751</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 EY011751-11</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 EY011751-12</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>EY011751</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 EY011751</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Lazar EL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cotter SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beck RW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonsall DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rutstein RP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holmes JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suh DW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leske DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoover DL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Writing Committee</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lorenzana IJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quinn GE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Repka MX</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Crouch ER</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A randomized trial comparing Bangerter filters and patching for the treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine whether visual acuity improvement with Bangerter filters is similar to improvement with patching as initial therapy for children with moderate amblyopia.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Randomized, clinical trial.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>We enrolled 186 children, 3 to &lt;10 years old, with moderate amblyopia (20/40-20/80).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Children were randomly assigned to receive either daily patching or to use a Bangerter filter on the spectacle lens in front of the fellow eye. Study visits were scheduled at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>Visual acuity in amblyopic eyes at 24 weeks.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>At 24 weeks, amblyopic eye improvement averaged 1.9 lines in the Bangerter group and 2.3 lines in the patching group (difference in mean visual acuities between gro</description><dates><release>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2010 May</publication><modification>2025-04-19T03:38:21.722Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:05:02Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC2864338</accession><cross_references><pubmed>20163869</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.014</doi></cross_references></HashMap>