<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Jabado OJ</submitter><funding>NEI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>354</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC2909221</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The analysis of oligonucleotide microarray data in pathogen surveillance and discovery is a challenging task. Target template concentration, nucleic acid integrity, and host nucleic acid composition can each have a profound effect on signal distribution. Exploratory analysis of fluorescent signal distribution in clinical samples has revealed deviations from normality, suggesting that distribution-free approaches should be applied.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Positive predictive value and false positive rates were examined to assess the utility of three well-established nonparametric methods for the analysis of viral array hybridization data: (1) Mann-Whitney U, (2) the Spearman correlation coefficient and (3) the chi-square test. Of the three tests, the chi-square proved most useful.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The acceptance of microarray use for routine clinical diagnostics will require that the technology be accompanied by simple yet reliable analytic methods. We report that our implementation of the chi-square test yielded a combination of low false positive rates and a high degree of predictive accuracy.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC bioinformatics</journal><pubmed_title>Nonparametric methods for the analysis of single-color pathogen microarrays.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC2909221</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 HL083850</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32GM008224</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>EY017404</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>AI57158-05</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 AI057158</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R24 EY017404</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>AI070411</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 AI070411</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HL083850</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Quan PL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lipkin WI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Briese T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hui J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jabado OJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Conlan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hornig M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palacios G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Nonparametric methods for the analysis of single-color pathogen microarrays.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The analysis of oligonucleotide microarray data in pathogen surveillance and discovery is a challenging task. Target template concentration, nucleic acid integrity, and host nucleic acid composition can each have a profound effect on signal distribution. Exploratory analysis of fluorescent signal distribution in clinical samples has revealed deviations from normality, suggesting that distribution-free approaches should be applied.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Positive predictive value and false positive rates were examined to assess the utility of three well-established nonparametric methods for the analysis of viral array hybridization data: (1) Mann-Whitney U, (2) the Spearman correlation coefficient and (3) the chi-square test. Of the three tests, the chi-square proved most useful.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The acceptance of microarray use for routine clinical diagnostics will require that the technology be accompanied by simple yet reliable analytic methods. We report that our implementation of the chi-square test yielded a combination of low false positive rates and a high degree of predictive accuracy.</description><dates><release>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2010 Jun</publication><modification>2024-10-15T02:34:38.979Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T00:32:40Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC2909221</accession><cross_references><pubmed>20584331</pubmed><doi>10.1186/1471-2105-11-354</doi></cross_references></HashMap>