biostudies-literatureSun WNIGMS NIH HHS3220-3228https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3101642biostudies-literatureUnknown115(8)The major objective of this paper is to address a controversial binding sequence between nucleic acid bases (NABs) and C(60) by investigating adsorptions of NABs and their cations on C(60) fullerene with a variety of density functional theories including two novel hybrid meta-GGA functionals, M05-2x and M06-2x, as well as a dispersion-corrected density functional, PBE-D. The M05-2x/6-311++G** provides the same binding sequence as previously reported, guanine(G) > cytosine(C) > adenine (A) > thymine (T); however, M06-2x switches the binding strengths of A and C, and PBE-D eventually results in the following sequence, G>A>T>C, which is the same as the widely accepted hierarchy for the stacking of NABs on other carbon nanomaterials such as single-walled carbon nanotube and graphite. The results indicate that the questionable relative binding strength is due to insufficient electron correlation treatment with the M05-2x or even the M06-2x method. The binding energy of G@C(60) obtained with the M06-2x/6-311++G(d,p) and the PBE-D/cc-pVDZ is -7.10 and -8.07 kcal/mol, respectively, and the latter is only slightly weaker than that predicted by the MP2/6-31G(d,p) (-8.10kca/mol). Thus, the PDE-D performs better than the M06-2x for the observed NAB@C(60) ?-stacked complexes. To discuss whether C(60) could prevent NABs from radiation-induced damage, ionization potentials of NABs and C(60), and frontier molecular orbitals of the complexes NABs@C(60) and (NABs@C(60))(+) are also extensively investigated. These results revealed that when an electron escapes from the complexes, a hole was preferentially created in C(60) for T and C complexes, while for G and A the hole delocalizes over the entire complex, rather than a localization on the C(60) moiety. The interesting finding might open a new strategy for protecting DNA from radiation-induced damage and offer a new idea for designing C(60)-based antiradiation drugs.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfacesOn the Binding Strength Sequence for Nucleic Acid Bases and C(60) with Density Functional and Dispersion-corrected Density Functional Theories: Whether C(60) could protect nucleic acid bases from radiation-induced damage?PMC3101642SC3 GM082324-04SC3 GM082324-03SC3 GM082324SC3 GM082324-02S1Bu YSun WWang YfalseOn the Binding Strength Sequence for Nucleic Acid Bases and C(60) with Density Functional and Dispersion-corrected Density Functional Theories: Whether C(60) could protect nucleic acid bases from radiation-induced damage?The major objective of this paper is to address a controversial binding sequence between nucleic acid bases (NABs) and C(60) by investigating adsorptions of NABs and their cations on C(60) fullerene with a variety of density functional theories including two novel hybrid meta-GGA functionals, M05-2x and M06-2x, as well as a dispersion-corrected density functional, PBE-D. The M05-2x/6-311++G** provides the same binding sequence as previously reported, guanine(G) > cytosine(C) > adenine (A) > thymine (T); however, M06-2x switches the binding strengths of A and C, and PBE-D eventually results in the following sequence, G>A>T>C, which is the same as the widely accepted hierarchy for the stacking of NABs on other carbon nanomaterials such as single-walled carbon nanotube and graphite. The results indicate that the questionable relative binding strength is due to insufficient electron correlation treatment with the M05-2x or even the M06-2x method. The binding energy of G@C(60) obtained with the M06-2x/6-311++G(d,p) and the PBE-D/cc-pVDZ is -7.10 and -8.07 kcal/mol, respectively, and the latter is only slightly weaker than that predicted by the MP2/6-31G(d,p) (-8.10kca/mol). Thus, the PDE-D performs better than the M06-2x for the observed NAB@C(60) ?-stacked complexes. To discuss whether C(60) could prevent NABs from radiation-induced damage, ionization potentials of NABs and C(60), and frontier molecular orbitals of the complexes NABs@C(60) and (NABs@C(60))(+) are also extensively investigated. These results revealed that when an electron escapes from the complexes, a hole was preferentially created in C(60) for T and C complexes, while for G and A the hole delocalizes over the entire complex, rather than a localization on the C(60) moiety. The interesting finding might open a new strategy for protecting DNA from radiation-induced damage and offer a new idea for designing C(60)-based antiradiation drugs.2011-01-01T00:00:00Z2011 Mar2020-10-31T09:26:18Z2019-03-27T00:41:58ZS-EPMC31016422162536110.1021/jp108812z