<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Jarcho JM</submitter><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><pagination>460-7</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3150852</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>People rationalize the choices they make when confronted with difficult decisions by claiming they never wanted the option they did not choose. Behavioral studies on cognitive dissonance provide evidence for decision-induced attitude change, but these studies cannot fully uncover the mechanisms driving the attitude change because only pre- and post-decision attitudes are measured, rather than the process of change itself. In the first fMRI study to examine the decision phase in a decision-based cognitive dissonance paradigm, we observed that increased activity in right-inferior frontal gyrus, medial fronto-parietal regions and ventral striatum, and decreased activity in anterior insula were associated with subsequent decision-related attitude change. These findings suggest the characteristic rationalization processes that are associated with decision-making may be engaged very quickly at the moment of the decision, without extended deliberation and may involve reappraisal-like emotion regulation processes.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Social cognitive and affective neuroscience</journal><pubmed_title>The neural basis of rationalization: cognitive dissonance reduction during decision-making.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC3150852</pmcid><funding_grant_id>T32 MH017140</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>F31 DA024904</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>F31 DA024904-01A1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 MH071521</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T90 DA022768</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MH 071521</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>F31 DA021951</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Jarcho JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berkman ET</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lieberman MD</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The neural basis of rationalization: cognitive dissonance reduction during decision-making.</name><description>People rationalize the choices they make when confronted with difficult decisions by claiming they never wanted the option they did not choose. Behavioral studies on cognitive dissonance provide evidence for decision-induced attitude change, but these studies cannot fully uncover the mechanisms driving the attitude change because only pre- and post-decision attitudes are measured, rather than the process of change itself. In the first fMRI study to examine the decision phase in a decision-based cognitive dissonance paradigm, we observed that increased activity in right-inferior frontal gyrus, medial fronto-parietal regions and ventral striatum, and decreased activity in anterior insula were associated with subsequent decision-related attitude change. These findings suggest the characteristic rationalization processes that are associated with decision-making may be engaged very quickly at the moment of the decision, without extended deliberation and may involve reappraisal-like emotion regulation processes.</description><dates><release>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2011 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-21T13:46:38.547Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T03:07:45Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC3150852</accession><cross_references><pubmed>20621961</pubmed><doi>10.1093/scan/nsq054</doi></cross_references></HashMap>