<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Yuan J</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>16723-8</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3189057</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>108(40)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), has been shown to improve survival in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. It also enhances immunity to NY-ESO-1, a cancer/testis antigen expressed in a subset of patients with melanoma. To characterize the association between immune response and clinical outcome, we first analyzed NY-ESO-1 serum antibody by ELISA in 144 ipilimumab-treated patients with melanoma and found 22 of 140 (16%) seropositive at baseline and 31 of 144 (22%) seropositive following treatment. These NY-ESO-1-seropositive patients had a greater likelihood of experiencing clinical benefit 24 wk after ipilimumab treatment than NY-ESO-1-seronegative patients (P = 0.02, relative risk = 1.8, two-tailed Fisher test). To understand why some patients with NY-ESO-1 antibody failed to experience clinical benefit, we analyzed NY-ESO-1-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses by intracellular multicytokine staining in 20 NY-ESO-1-seropositive patients and found a surprising dissociation between NY-ESO-1 antibody and CD8 responses in some patients. NY-ESO-1-seropositive patients with associated CD8(+) T cells experienced more frequent clinical benefit (10 of 13; 77%) than those with undetectable CD8(+) T-cell response (one of seven; 14%; P = 0.02; relative risk = 5.4, two-tailed Fisher test), as well as a significant survival advantage (P = 0.01; hazard ratio = 0.2, time-dependent Cox model). Together, our data suggest that integrated NY-ESO-1 immune responses may have predictive value for ipilimumab treatment and argue for prospective studies in patients with established NY-ESO-1 immunity. The current findings provide a strong rationale for the clinical use of modulators of immunosuppression with concurrent approaches to favor tumor antigen-specific immune responses, such as vaccines or adoptive transfer, in patients with cancer.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</journal><pubmed_title>Integrated NY-ESO-1 antibody and CD8+ T-cell responses correlate with clinical benefit in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC3189057</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P50 CA121974</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01CA33049</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1 P50 CA121974</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 CA033049</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Jungbluth AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allison JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sznol M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gnjatic S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wolchok JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ginsberg BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yuan J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rasalan TS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pogoriler E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gallardo HF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adamow M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuk D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Panageas KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ritter G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Halaban R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Old LJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ritter E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Terzulli SL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Integrated NY-ESO-1 antibody and CD8+ T-cell responses correlate with clinical benefit in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab.</name><description>Ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), has been shown to improve survival in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. It also enhances immunity to NY-ESO-1, a cancer/testis antigen expressed in a subset of patients with melanoma. To characterize the association between immune response and clinical outcome, we first analyzed NY-ESO-1 serum antibody by ELISA in 144 ipilimumab-treated patients with melanoma and found 22 of 140 (16%) seropositive at baseline and 31 of 144 (22%) seropositive following treatment. These NY-ESO-1-seropositive patients had a greater likelihood of experiencing clinical benefit 24 wk after ipilimumab treatment than NY-ESO-1-seronegative patients (P = 0.02, relative risk = 1.8, two-tailed Fisher test). To understand why some patients with NY-ESO-1 antibody failed to experience clinical benefit, we analyzed NY-ESO-1-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses by intracellular multicytokine staining in 20 NY-ESO-1-seropositive patients and found a surprising dissociation between NY-ESO-1 antibody and CD8 responses in some patients. NY-ESO-1-seropositive patients with associated CD8(+) T cells experienced more frequent clinical benefit (10 of 13; 77%) than those with undetectable CD8(+) T-cell response (one of seven; 14%; P = 0.02; relative risk = 5.4, two-tailed Fisher test), as well as a significant survival advantage (P = 0.01; hazard ratio = 0.2, time-dependent Cox model). Together, our data suggest that integrated NY-ESO-1 immune responses may have predictive value for ipilimumab treatment and argue for prospective studies in patients with established NY-ESO-1 immunity. The current findings provide a strong rationale for the clinical use of modulators of immunosuppression with concurrent approaches to favor tumor antigen-specific immune responses, such as vaccines or adoptive transfer, in patients with cancer.</description><dates><release>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2011 Oct</publication><modification>2021-02-25T09:44:29Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T00:44:43Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC3189057</accession><cross_references><pubmed>21933959</pubmed><doi>10.1073/pnas.1110814108</doi></cross_references></HashMap>