<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(6)</volume><submitter>Mansour D</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The primary objective was to assess the efficacy, cycle control and tolerability of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) and 17β-oestradiol (E2). Effects on acne were evaluated as a secondary objective. Results were compared to those of a COC containing drospirenone (DRSP) and ethinylestradiol (EE).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Women (aged 18-50 years) were randomised to receive NOMAC/E2 (2.5 mg/1.5 mg) in a 24/4-day regimen (n=1591) or DRSP/EE (3 mg/30 μg) in a 21/7-day regimen (n=535) for 13 cycles.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Estimated Pearl Indices for NOMAC/E2 and DRSP/EE were 0.38 and 0.81 in women aged≤35 years and 0.31 and 0.66 for all women (18-50 years), respectively. Scheduled withdrawal bleedings were shorter and lighter among users of N</pubmed_abstract><journal>The European journal of contraception &amp; reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception</journal><pagination>430-43</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3233274</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Efficacy and tolerability of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate and 17β-oestradiol in a 24/4 regimen, in comparison to an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and drospirenone in a 21/7 regimen.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC3233274</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Mansour D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taneepanichskul S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sommer W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weisberg E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sundstrom-Poromaa I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Melis GB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Verhoeven C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Korver T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Efficacy and tolerability of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate and 17β-oestradiol in a 24/4 regimen, in comparison to an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and drospirenone in a 21/7 regimen.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The primary objective was to assess the efficacy, cycle control and tolerability of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) and 17β-oestradiol (E2). Effects on acne were evaluated as a secondary objective. Results were compared to those of a COC containing drospirenone (DRSP) and ethinylestradiol (EE).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Women (aged 18-50 years) were randomised to receive NOMAC/E2 (2.5 mg/1.5 mg) in a 24/4-day regimen (n=1591) or DRSP/EE (3 mg/30 μg) in a 21/7-day regimen (n=535) for 13 cycles.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Estimated Pearl Indices for NOMAC/E2 and DRSP/EE were 0.38 and 0.81 in women aged≤35 years and 0.31 and 0.66 for all women (18-50 years), respectively. Scheduled withdrawal bleedings were shorter and lighter among users of N</description><dates><release>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2011 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-05T13:50:39.343Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T00:46:49Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC3233274</accession><cross_references><pubmed>21995590</pubmed><doi>10.3109/13625187.2011.614029</doi></cross_references></HashMap>