<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Baele G</submitter><funding>European Research Council</funding><funding>NCRR NIH HHS</funding><funding>European Commission FP7</funding><funding>NHGRI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NINDS NIH HHS</funding><funding>Wellcome Trust</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2157-67</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3424409</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>29(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Recent developments in marginal likelihood estimation for model selection in the field of Bayesian phylogenetics and molecular evolution have emphasized the poor performance of the harmonic mean estimator (HME). Although these studies have shown the merits of new approaches applied to standard normally distributed examples and small real-world data sets, not much is currently known concerning the performance and computational issues of these methods when fitting complex evolutionary and population genetic models to empirical real-world data sets. Further, these approaches have not yet seen widespread application in the field due to the lack of implementations of these computationally demanding techniques in commonly used phylogenetic packages. We here investigate the performance of some of</pubmed_abstract><journal>Molecular biology and evolution</journal><pubmed_title>Improving the accuracy of demographic and molecular clock model comparison while accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC3424409</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 GM086887</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>WT092807MA</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 NS063897</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 RR024386-01A2</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>FP7_260864</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HG006139</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>FP7_278433</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>260864</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>095831</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Rambaut A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alekseyenko AV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baele G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suchard MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lemey P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bedford T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Improving the accuracy of demographic and molecular clock model comparison while accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty.</name><description>Recent developments in marginal likelihood estimation for model selection in the field of Bayesian phylogenetics and molecular evolution have emphasized the poor performance of the harmonic mean estimator (HME). Although these studies have shown the merits of new approaches applied to standard normally distributed examples and small real-world data sets, not much is currently known concerning the performance and computational issues of these methods when fitting complex evolutionary and population genetic models to empirical real-world data sets. Further, these approaches have not yet seen widespread application in the field due to the lack of implementations of these computationally demanding techniques in commonly used phylogenetic packages. We here investigate the performance of some of</description><dates><release>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2012 Sep</publication><modification>2025-06-25T03:06:07.428Z</modification><creation>2025-06-25T03:06:07.428Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC3424409</accession><cross_references><pubmed>22403239</pubmed><doi>10.1093/molbev/mss084</doi></cross_references></HashMap>