{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["3(1)"],"submitter":["Weiss EA"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>To determine if there is a significant difference in the infection rates of wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline (SS) versus tap water (TW), before primary wound closure.<h4>Design</h4>Single centre, prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled trial. Wound irrigation solution type was computer randomised and allocation was done on a sequential basis.<h4>Setting</h4>Stanford University Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine.<h4>Participants</h4>Patients older than 1 year of age, who presented to the emergency department with a soft tissue laceration requiring repair, were entered into the study under informed consent. Exclusion criteria included any underlying immunocompromising illness, current use of antibiotics, puncture or bite wounds, underlying t"],"journal":["BMJ open"],"pagination":["e001504"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3549228"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Water is a safe and effective alternative to sterile normal saline for wound irrigation prior to suturing: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial."],"pmcid":["PMC3549228"],"pubmed_authors":["Weiss EA","Quinn JV","Oldham G","Lin M","Foster T"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Water is a safe and effective alternative to sterile normal saline for wound irrigation prior to suturing: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>To determine if there is a significant difference in the infection rates of wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline (SS) versus tap water (TW), before primary wound closure.<h4>Design</h4>Single centre, prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled trial. Wound irrigation solution type was computer randomised and allocation was done on a sequential basis.<h4>Setting</h4>Stanford University Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine.<h4>Participants</h4>Patients older than 1 year of age, who presented to the emergency department with a soft tissue laceration requiring repair, were entered into the study under informed consent. Exclusion criteria included any underlying immunocompromising illness, current use of antibiotics, puncture or bite wounds, underlying t","dates":{"release":"2013-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2013 Jan","modification":"2026-04-13T13:29:30.375Z","creation":"2019-03-27T01:03:31Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC3549228","cross_references":{"pubmed":["23325896"],"doi":["10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001504"]}}