<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>3(1)</volume><submitter>Weiss EA</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine if there is a significant difference in the infection rates of wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline (SS) versus tap water (TW), before primary wound closure.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Single centre, prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled trial. Wound irrigation solution type was computer randomised and allocation was done on a sequential basis.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Stanford University Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Patients older than 1 year of age, who presented to the emergency department with a soft tissue laceration requiring repair, were entered into the study under informed consent. Exclusion criteria included any underlying immunocompromising illness, current use of antibiotics, puncture or bite wounds, underlying t</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pagination>e001504</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3549228</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Water is a safe and effective alternative to sterile normal saline for wound irrigation prior to suturing: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC3549228</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Weiss EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quinn JV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oldham G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Foster T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Water is a safe and effective alternative to sterile normal saline for wound irrigation prior to suturing: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine if there is a significant difference in the infection rates of wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline (SS) versus tap water (TW), before primary wound closure.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Single centre, prospective, randomised, double-blind controlled trial. Wound irrigation solution type was computer randomised and allocation was done on a sequential basis.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Stanford University Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Patients older than 1 year of age, who presented to the emergency department with a soft tissue laceration requiring repair, were entered into the study under informed consent. Exclusion criteria included any underlying immunocompromising illness, current use of antibiotics, puncture or bite wounds, underlying t</description><dates><release>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2013 Jan</publication><modification>2026-04-13T13:29:30.375Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:03:31Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC3549228</accession><cross_references><pubmed>23325896</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001504</doi></cross_references></HashMap>