<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Pagoto SL</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>137-43</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3570637</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>75(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Attention control (AC) conditions are used to balance nonspecific attention in randomized trials of behavioral interventions. Very little guidance about which behavioral interventions and outcomes merit AC is available in the literature. The primary aim of the present study is to demonstrate a scenario in which use of AC in a behavioral randomized trial was unnecessary and possibly detrimental.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Exploratory analyses were performed in a randomized controlled trial that tested whether a patient-centered counseling intervention reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in 355 participants with peripheral arterial disease, compared with AC and usual care (UC) conditions. The patient-centered counseling intervention was designed to activate participants </pubmed_abstract><journal>Psychosomatic medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Can attention control conditions have detrimental effects on behavioral medicine randomized trials?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC3570637</pmcid><funding_grant_id>K23 HL109620</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR000150</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL073912</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01-HL073912</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Ockene I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pagoto SL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McDermott MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reed G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greenland P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Whited M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Appelhans B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leung K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schneider K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Merriam P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mazor KM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ockene JK</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Can attention control conditions have detrimental effects on behavioral medicine randomized trials?</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Attention control (AC) conditions are used to balance nonspecific attention in randomized trials of behavioral interventions. Very little guidance about which behavioral interventions and outcomes merit AC is available in the literature. The primary aim of the present study is to demonstrate a scenario in which use of AC in a behavioral randomized trial was unnecessary and possibly detrimental.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Exploratory analyses were performed in a randomized controlled trial that tested whether a patient-centered counseling intervention reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in 355 participants with peripheral arterial disease, compared with AC and usual care (UC) conditions. The patient-centered counseling intervention was designed to activate participants </description><dates><release>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2013 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-22T15:07:32.743Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:04:44Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC3570637</accession><cross_references><pubmed>23197844</pubmed><doi>10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182765dd2</doi><doi>10.1097/psy.0b013e3182765dd2</doi></cross_references></HashMap>