<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>7(2)</volume><submitter>Shepard DS</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Dengue poses a substantial economic and disease burden in Southeast Asia (SEA). Quantifying this burden is critical to set policy priorities and disease-control strategies.&lt;h4>Methods and findings&lt;/h4>We estimated the economic and disease burden of dengue in 12 countries in SEA: Bhutan, Brunei, Cambodia, East-Timor, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Viet Nam. We obtained reported cases from multiple sources--surveillance data, World Health Organization (WHO), and published studies--and adjusted for underreporting using expansion factors from previous literature. We obtained unit costs per episode through a systematic literature review, and completed missing data using linear regressions. We excluded costs such as prevention and vector control, and long-term sequelae of dengue. Over the decade of 2001-2010, we obtained an annual average of 2.9 million (m) dengue episodes and 5,906 deaths. The annual economic burden (with 95% certainty levels) was US$950m (US$610m-US$1,384m) or about US$1.65 (US$1.06-US$2.41) per capita. The annual number of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), based on the original 1994 definition, was 214,000 (120,000-299,000), which is equivalent to 372 (210-520) DALYs per million inhabitants.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Dengue poses a substantial economic and disease burden in SEA with a DALY burden per million inhabitants in the region. This burden is higher than that of 17 other conditions, including Japanese encephalitis, upper respiratory infections, and hepatitis B.</pubmed_abstract><journal>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</journal><pagination>e2055</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3578748</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC3578748</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Halasa YA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Undurraga EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shepard DS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Dengue poses a substantial economic and disease burden in Southeast Asia (SEA). Quantifying this burden is critical to set policy priorities and disease-control strategies.&lt;h4>Methods and findings&lt;/h4>We estimated the economic and disease burden of dengue in 12 countries in SEA: Bhutan, Brunei, Cambodia, East-Timor, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Viet Nam. We obtained reported cases from multiple sources--surveillance data, World Health Organization (WHO), and published studies--and adjusted for underreporting using expansion factors from previous literature. We obtained unit costs per episode through a systematic literature review, and completed missing data using linear regressions. We excluded costs such as prevention and vector control, and long-term sequelae of dengue. Over the decade of 2001-2010, we obtained an annual average of 2.9 million (m) dengue episodes and 5,906 deaths. The annual economic burden (with 95% certainty levels) was US$950m (US$610m-US$1,384m) or about US$1.65 (US$1.06-US$2.41) per capita. The annual number of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), based on the original 1994 definition, was 214,000 (120,000-299,000), which is equivalent to 372 (210-520) DALYs per million inhabitants.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Dengue poses a substantial economic and disease burden in SEA with a DALY burden per million inhabitants in the region. This burden is higher than that of 17 other conditions, including Japanese encephalitis, upper respiratory infections, and hepatitis B.</description><dates><release>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2013</publication><modification>2024-10-18T15:45:13.189Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:05:05Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC3578748</accession><cross_references><pubmed>23437406</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pntd.0002055</doi></cross_references></HashMap>