<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Walters S</submitter><funding>Cancer Research UK</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><pagination>1195-208</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3619080</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>108(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>We investigate whether differences in breast cancer survival in six high-income countries can be explained by differences in stage at diagnosis using routine data from population-based cancer registries.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We analysed the data on 257,362 women diagnosed with breast cancer during 2000-7 and registered in 13 population-based cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK. Flexible parametric hazard models were used to estimate net survival and the excess hazard of dying from breast cancer up to 3 years after diagnosis.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Age-standardised 3-year net survival was 87-89% in the UK and Denmark, and 91-94% in the other four countries. Stage at diagnosis was relatively advanced in Denmark: only 30% of women had Tumour, Nodes,</pubmed_abstract><journal>British journal of cancer</journal><pubmed_title>Breast cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK, 2000-2007: a population-based study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC3619080</pmcid><funding_grant_id>16148</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>C1336/A11700</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>11700</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Steward J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andersen O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brostrom S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tracey E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>ICBP Module 1 Working Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coldman A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shin J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hosbond C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hatcher J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walters S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quin N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>MacDonald A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bergh J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Warnberg F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Butler J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johannesen TB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Middleton R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lambe M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Russell C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marrett L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Milnes K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hanson J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kaasa S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coleman MP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rachet B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McLaughlin J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Engholm G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lagord C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gunnarsson G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maringe C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nishri D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adolfsson J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGahan CE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thomas B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moneypenny I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gjerstorff ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harper T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wist E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fornander T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Turner D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boyages J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gavin A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kirk S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barrett-Lee P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Christiansen P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allemani C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sherar M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rabenek L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lawrence G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dhaliwal D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Forman D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Richards MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Currow D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Porter G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meechan D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bryant H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Breast cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK, 2000-2007: a population-based study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>We investigate whether differences in breast cancer survival in six high-income countries can be explained by differences in stage at diagnosis using routine data from population-based cancer registries.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We analysed the data on 257,362 women diagnosed with breast cancer during 2000-7 and registered in 13 population-based cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK. Flexible parametric hazard models were used to estimate net survival and the excess hazard of dying from breast cancer up to 3 years after diagnosis.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Age-standardised 3-year net survival was 87-89% in the UK and Denmark, and 91-94% in the other four countries. Stage at diagnosis was relatively advanced in Denmark: only 30% of women had Tumour, Nodes,</description><dates><release>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2013 Mar</publication><modification>2026-05-05T05:36:47.837Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:07:07Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC3619080</accession><cross_references><pubmed>23449362</pubmed><doi>10.1038/bjc.2013.6</doi></cross_references></HashMap>