<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>8(4)</volume><submitter>Graham BS</submitter><funding>Intramural NIH HHS</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>DNA vaccine immunogenicity has been limited by inefficient delivery. Needle-free delivery of DNA using a CO2-powered Biojector® device was compared to delivery by needle and syringe and evaluated for safety and immunogenicity.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Forty adults, 18-50 years, were randomly assigned to intramuscular (IM) vaccinations with DNA vaccine, VRC-HIVDNA016-00-VP, (weeks 0, 4, 8) by Biojector® 2000™ or needle and syringe (N/S) and boosted IM at week 24 with VRC-HIVADV014-00-VP (rAd5) with N/S at 10(10) or 10(11) particle units (PU). Equal numbers per assigned schedule had low (≤500) or high (>500) reciprocal titers of preexisting Ad5 neutralizing antibody.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>120 DNA and 39 rAd5 injections were given; 36 subjects completed follow-up research sample collections. IFN-γ ELISpot response rates were 17/19 (89%) for Biojector® and 13/17 (76%) for N/S delivery at Week 28 (4 weeks post rAd5 boost). The magnitude of ELISpot response was about 3-fold higher in Biojector® compared to N/S groups. Similar effects on response rates and magnitude were observed for CD8+, but not CD4+ T-cell responses by ICS. Env-specific antibody responses were about 10-fold higher in Biojector-primed subjects.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>DNA vaccination by Biojector® was well-tolerated and compared to needle injection, primed for greater IFN-γ ELISpot, CD8+ T-cell, and antibody responses after rAd5 boosting.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00109629.</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pagination>e59340</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3620125</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>DNA vaccine delivered by a needle-free injection device improves potency of priming for antibody and CD8+ T-cell responses after rAd5 boost in a randomized clinical trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC3620125</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Sitar S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Novik L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roederer M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Catanzaro A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DuBois W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andrews C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stein J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alley T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Plummer SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thompson E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koup RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nason MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zaia P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eaton E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>VRC 008 Study Team</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DeCederfelt H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gordon IJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bailer RT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holman L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goswami T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yan L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Casazza J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Starling J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stanford L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Larkin B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lau CY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Graham BS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McCluskey M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sheets R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mascola JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rucker S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ledgerwood JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Edmonds P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Enama ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jones R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rhone K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peel SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nabel GJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gomez P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>DNA vaccine delivered by a needle-free injection device improves potency of priming for antibody and CD8+ T-cell responses after rAd5 boost in a randomized clinical trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>DNA vaccine immunogenicity has been limited by inefficient delivery. Needle-free delivery of DNA using a CO2-powered Biojector® device was compared to delivery by needle and syringe and evaluated for safety and immunogenicity.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Forty adults, 18-50 years, were randomly assigned to intramuscular (IM) vaccinations with DNA vaccine, VRC-HIVDNA016-00-VP, (weeks 0, 4, 8) by Biojector® 2000™ or needle and syringe (N/S) and boosted IM at week 24 with VRC-HIVADV014-00-VP (rAd5) with N/S at 10(10) or 10(11) particle units (PU). Equal numbers per assigned schedule had low (≤500) or high (>500) reciprocal titers of preexisting Ad5 neutralizing antibody.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>120 DNA and 39 rAd5 injections were given; 36 subjects completed follow-up research sample collections. IFN-γ ELISpot response rates were 17/19 (89%) for Biojector® and 13/17 (76%) for N/S delivery at Week 28 (4 weeks post rAd5 boost). The magnitude of ELISpot response was about 3-fold higher in Biojector® compared to N/S groups. Similar effects on response rates and magnitude were observed for CD8+, but not CD4+ T-cell responses by ICS. Env-specific antibody responses were about 10-fold higher in Biojector-primed subjects.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>DNA vaccination by Biojector® was well-tolerated and compared to needle injection, primed for greater IFN-γ ELISpot, CD8+ T-cell, and antibody responses after rAd5 boosting.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00109629.</description><dates><release>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2013</publication><modification>2026-05-01T20:58:15.909Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:14:04Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC3620125</accession><cross_references><pubmed>23577062</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0059340</doi></cross_references></HashMap>