{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Chiang MF"],"funding":["NEI NIH HHS"],"pagination":["1272-80"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3637992"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["119(6)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the accuracy of detecting clinically significant retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) using wide-angle digital retinal photography.<h4>Methods</h4>Literature searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were conducted last on December 7, 2010, and yielded 414 unique citations. The authors assessed these 414 citations and marked 82 that potentially met the inclusion criteria. These 82 studies were reviewed in full text; 28 studies met inclusion criteria. The authors extracted from these studies information about study design, interventions, outcomes, and study quality. After data abstraction, 18 were excluded for study deficiencies or because they were superseded by a more recent publication. The methodologist reviewed the remaining 10 studies and assigned"],"journal":["Ophthalmology"],"pubmed_title":["Detection of clinically significant retinopathy of prematurity using wide-angle digital retinal photography: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology."],"pmcid":["PMC3637992"],"funding_grant_id":["R01 EY019474","K12 EY027720"],"pubmed_authors":["Lambert SR","Melia M","Recchia FM","Chiang MF","Buffenn AN","Yang MB","Simpson JL"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Detection of clinically significant retinopathy of prematurity using wide-angle digital retinal photography: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the accuracy of detecting clinically significant retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) using wide-angle digital retinal photography.<h4>Methods</h4>Literature searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were conducted last on December 7, 2010, and yielded 414 unique citations. The authors assessed these 414 citations and marked 82 that potentially met the inclusion criteria. These 82 studies were reviewed in full text; 28 studies met inclusion criteria. The authors extracted from these studies information about study design, interventions, outcomes, and study quality. After data abstraction, 18 were excluded for study deficiencies or because they were superseded by a more recent publication. The methodologist reviewed the remaining 10 studies and assigned","dates":{"release":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2012 Jun","modification":"2025-04-18T16:25:50.808Z","creation":"2019-03-26T23:06:36Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC3637992","cross_references":{"pubmed":["22541632"],"doi":["10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.002"]}}