<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Chen Y</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>219</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3755267</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>3</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor performance status (PS) or co-morbidities are often not candidates for standard chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) due to poor tolerance to treatments. A pilot study for poor-risk stage III NSCLC patients was conducted combining cetuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with chest radiation (RT).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Stage III NSCLC patients with Zubrod PS 2, or Zubrod PS 0-1 with poor pulmonary function and co-morbidities prohibiting chemoRT were eligible. A loading dose of cetuximab (400 mg/m(2)) was delivered week 1, followed by weekly cetuximab (250 mg/m(2))/RT to 64.8 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions, and maintenance weekly cetuximab (250 mg/m(2)) for 2 years or until disease progression. H-score for EGFR protein expression was conducted in available tumors.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Twenty-two were assessed for outcome and toxicity. Median survival was 14 months and median progression-free survival was 8 months. The response rate was 47% and disease control rate was 74%. Toxicity assessment revealed 22.7% overall ≥Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities. Grade 3 esophagitis was observed in one patient (5%). The skin reactions were mostly Grade 1 or 2 except two of 22 (9%) had Grade 3 acne and one of 22 (5%) had Grade 3 radiation skin burn. Grade 3-4 hypomagnesemia was seen in four (18%) patients. One patient (5%) had elevated cardiac troponin and pulmonary emboli. H-score did not reveal prognostic significance. An initially planned second cohort of the study did not commence due to slow accrual, which would have added weekly docetaxel to cetuximab/RT after completion of the first cohort of patients.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Concurrent weekly cetuximab/chest RT followed by maintenance cetuximab for poor-risk stage III NSCLC was well tolerated. Further studies with larger sample sizes will be useful to establish the optimal therapeutic ratio of this regimen.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in oncology</journal><pubmed_title>A Pilot Study (SWOG S0429) of Weekly Cetuximab and Chest Radiotherapy for Poor-Risk Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC3755267</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U10 CA035431</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>N01 CA032102</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>N01 CA038926</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>N01 CA027057</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA032102</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA004919</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA011083</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA045808</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>N01 CA046441</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA046282</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA038926</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180846</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>N01 CA004919</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA093373</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA027057</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>N01 CA035431</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA046441</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233340</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Gaspar LE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hirsch FR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lau DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gandara DR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kelly K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pandya KJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moon J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Redman M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A Pilot Study (SWOG S0429) of Weekly Cetuximab and Chest Radiotherapy for Poor-Risk Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor performance status (PS) or co-morbidities are often not candidates for standard chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) due to poor tolerance to treatments. A pilot study for poor-risk stage III NSCLC patients was conducted combining cetuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with chest radiation (RT).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Stage III NSCLC patients with Zubrod PS 2, or Zubrod PS 0-1 with poor pulmonary function and co-morbidities prohibiting chemoRT were eligible. A loading dose of cetuximab (400 mg/m(2)) was delivered week 1, followed by weekly cetuximab (250 mg/m(2))/RT to 64.8 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions, and maintenance weekly cetuximab (250 mg/m(2)) for 2 years or until disease progression. H-score for EGFR protein expression was conducted in available tumors.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Twenty-two were assessed for outcome and toxicity. Median survival was 14 months and median progression-free survival was 8 months. The response rate was 47% and disease control rate was 74%. Toxicity assessment revealed 22.7% overall ≥Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities. Grade 3 esophagitis was observed in one patient (5%). The skin reactions were mostly Grade 1 or 2 except two of 22 (9%) had Grade 3 acne and one of 22 (5%) had Grade 3 radiation skin burn. Grade 3-4 hypomagnesemia was seen in four (18%) patients. One patient (5%) had elevated cardiac troponin and pulmonary emboli. H-score did not reveal prognostic significance. An initially planned second cohort of the study did not commence due to slow accrual, which would have added weekly docetaxel to cetuximab/RT after completion of the first cohort of patients.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Concurrent weekly cetuximab/chest RT followed by maintenance cetuximab for poor-risk stage III NSCLC was well tolerated. Further studies with larger sample sizes will be useful to establish the optimal therapeutic ratio of this regimen.</description><dates><release>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2013</publication><modification>2025-04-04T10:30:05.232Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:15:10Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC3755267</accession><cross_references><pubmed>24010120</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fonc.2013.00219</doi></cross_references></HashMap>