<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores><citationCount>0</citationCount><reanalysisCount>0</reanalysisCount><viewCount>48</viewCount><searchCount>0</searchCount></scores><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(1)</volume><submitter>Gundemir S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Across four studies, we found evidence for an implicit pro-White leadership bias that helps explain the underrepresentation of ethnic minorities in leadership positions. Both White-majority and ethnic minority participants reacted significantly faster when ethnically White names and leadership roles (e.g., manager; Study 1) or leadership traits (e.g., decisiveness; Study 2 &amp; 3) were paired in an Implicit Association Test (IAT) rather than when ethnic minority names and leadership traits were paired. Moreover, the implicit pro-White leadership bias showed discriminant validity with the conventional implicit bias measures (Study 3). Importantly, results showed that the pro-White leadership bias can be weakened when situational cues increase the salience of a dual identity (Study 4). This, in turn, can diminish the explicit pro-White bias in promotion related decision making processes (Study 4). This research offers a new tool to measure the implicit psychological processes underlying the underrepresentation of ethnic minorities in leadership positions and proposes interventions to weaken such biases.</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pagination>e83915</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC3885528</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Think leader, think White? Capturing and weakening an implicit pro-White leadership bias.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC3885528</pmcid><pubmed_authors>de Dreu CK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Vugt M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gundemir S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Homan AC</pubmed_authors><view_count>48</view_count></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Think leader, think White? Capturing and weakening an implicit pro-White leadership bias.</name><description>Across four studies, we found evidence for an implicit pro-White leadership bias that helps explain the underrepresentation of ethnic minorities in leadership positions. Both White-majority and ethnic minority participants reacted significantly faster when ethnically White names and leadership roles (e.g., manager; Study 1) or leadership traits (e.g., decisiveness; Study 2 &amp; 3) were paired in an Implicit Association Test (IAT) rather than when ethnic minority names and leadership traits were paired. Moreover, the implicit pro-White leadership bias showed discriminant validity with the conventional implicit bias measures (Study 3). Importantly, results showed that the pro-White leadership bias can be weakened when situational cues increase the salience of a dual identity (Study 4). This, in turn, can diminish the explicit pro-White bias in promotion related decision making processes (Study 4). This research offers a new tool to measure the implicit psychological processes underlying the underrepresentation of ethnic minorities in leadership positions and proposes interventions to weaken such biases.</description><dates><release>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2014</publication><modification>2021-02-20T16:34:36Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:19:40Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC3885528</accession><cross_references><pubmed>24416181</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0083915</doi></cross_references></HashMap>