<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(5)</volume><submitter>Panagopoulos I</submitter><pubmed_abstract>An acute myeloid leukemia was suspected of having a t(8;16)(p11;p13) resulting in a KAT6A-CREBBP fusion because the bone marrow was packed with monoblasts showing marked erythrophagocytosis. The diagnostic karyotype was 46,XY,add(1)(p13),t(8;21)(p11;q22),der(16)t(1;16)(p13;p13)[9]/46,XY[1]; thus, no direct confirmation of the suspicion could be given although both 8p11 and 16p13 seemed to be rearranged. The leukemic cells were examined in two ways to find out whether a cryptic KAT6A-CREBBP was present. The first was the "conventional" approach: G-banding was followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The second was RNA-Seq followed by data analysis using FusionMap and FusionFinder programs with special emphasis on candidates located in the</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pagination>e96570</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4010518</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison between karyotyping-FISH-reverse transcription PCR and RNA-sequencing-fusion gene identification programs in the detection of KAT6A-CREBBP in acute myeloid leukemia.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4010518</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Panagopoulos I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gorunova L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torkildsen S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tierens A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heim S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tjonnfjord GE</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison between karyotyping-FISH-reverse transcription PCR and RNA-sequencing-fusion gene identification programs in the detection of KAT6A-CREBBP in acute myeloid leukemia.</name><description>An acute myeloid leukemia was suspected of having a t(8;16)(p11;p13) resulting in a KAT6A-CREBBP fusion because the bone marrow was packed with monoblasts showing marked erythrophagocytosis. The diagnostic karyotype was 46,XY,add(1)(p13),t(8;21)(p11;q22),der(16)t(1;16)(p13;p13)[9]/46,XY[1]; thus, no direct confirmation of the suspicion could be given although both 8p11 and 16p13 seemed to be rearranged. The leukemic cells were examined in two ways to find out whether a cryptic KAT6A-CREBBP was present. The first was the "conventional" approach: G-banding was followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The second was RNA-Seq followed by data analysis using FusionMap and FusionFinder programs with special emphasis on candidates located in the</description><dates><release>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2014</publication><modification>2026-04-07T19:37:01.401Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:24:38Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4010518</accession><cross_references><pubmed>24798186</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0096570</doi></cross_references></HashMap>