<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14</volume><submitter>Starczewska Amelio JM</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The prevalence of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumourgst (GIST) who fail currently available treatments imatinib and sunitinib (third-line treatment-eligible GIST) is unknown, but is expected to be below an ultra-orphan disease threshold of 2/100,000 population used in England and Wales. Our study was designed to estimate the prevalence and absolute number of UK patients with unresectable/metastatic GIST at first-, second- and eventually third-line treatment.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Our open population model estimates the probability that the prevalence of UK third-line treatment-eligible GIST patients will remain under the ultra-orphan disease threshold. Model parameters for incidence, proportion of unresectable/metastatic disease and survival estimates for GIST patients were obtained from a targeted literature review and a UK cancer register. The robustness of the results was checked through differing scenarios taking extreme values of the input parameters.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The base-case scenario estimated a prevalence of third-line treatment-eligible GIST of 1/100,000 and a prevalence count of 598 with a 99.9% likelihood of being below the ultra-orphan disease threshold. The extreme scenarios, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and threshold analysis confirmed the robustness of these results.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The prevalence of third-line treatment-eligible GIST is very low and highly likely below the ultra-orphan disease threshold.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC cancer</journal><pagination>364</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4039646</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Prevalence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in the United Kingdom at different therapeutic lines: an epidemiologic model.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4039646</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Khalid JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tzivelekis S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Starczewska Amelio JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Desai K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maguire A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cid Ruzafa J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ashman P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muston D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Prevalence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in the United Kingdom at different therapeutic lines: an epidemiologic model.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The prevalence of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumourgst (GIST) who fail currently available treatments imatinib and sunitinib (third-line treatment-eligible GIST) is unknown, but is expected to be below an ultra-orphan disease threshold of 2/100,000 population used in England and Wales. Our study was designed to estimate the prevalence and absolute number of UK patients with unresectable/metastatic GIST at first-, second- and eventually third-line treatment.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Our open population model estimates the probability that the prevalence of UK third-line treatment-eligible GIST patients will remain under the ultra-orphan disease threshold. Model parameters for incidence, proportion of unresectable/metastatic disease and survival estimates for GIST patients were obtained from a targeted literature review and a UK cancer register. The robustness of the results was checked through differing scenarios taking extreme values of the input parameters.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The base-case scenario estimated a prevalence of third-line treatment-eligible GIST of 1/100,000 and a prevalence count of 598 with a 99.9% likelihood of being below the ultra-orphan disease threshold. The extreme scenarios, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and threshold analysis confirmed the robustness of these results.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The prevalence of third-line treatment-eligible GIST is very low and highly likely below the ultra-orphan disease threshold.</description><dates><release>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2014 May</publication><modification>2024-11-21T02:59:59.879Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:29:10Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4039646</accession><cross_references><pubmed>24884940</pubmed><doi>10.1186/1471-2407-14-364</doi></cross_references></HashMap>